首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Coloproctology >Anismus, Physiology, Radiology: Is It Time for Some Pragmatism? A Comparative Study of Radiological and Anorectal Physiology Findings in Patients With Anismus
【24h】

Anismus, Physiology, Radiology: Is It Time for Some Pragmatism? A Comparative Study of Radiological and Anorectal Physiology Findings in Patients With Anismus

机译:Anismus,生理学,放射学:是时候进行一些实用主义了吗?肛门肛门畸形患者放射和肛门直肠生理检查结果的比较研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Purpose Anismus is a functional disorder featuring obstructive symptoms and paradoxical contractions of the pelvic floor. This study aims to establish diagnosis agreement between physiology and radiology, associate anismus with morphological outlet obstruction, and explore the role of sphincteric pressure and rectal volumes in the radiological diagnosis of anismus. Methods Consecutive patients were evaluated by using magnetic resonance imaging proctography/fluoroscopic defecography and anorectal physiology. Morphological radiological features were associated with physiology tests. A categorical analysis was performed using the chi-square test, and agreement was assessed via the kappa coefficient. A Mann-Whitney test was used to assess rectal volumes and sphincterial pressure distributions between groups of patients. A P-value of Results Forty-three patients (42 female patients) underwent anorectal physiology and radiology imaging. The median age was 54 years (interquartile range, 41.5–60 years). Anismus was seen radiologically and physiologically in 18 (41.8%) and 12 patients (27.9%), respectively. The agreement between modalities was 0.298 (P = 0.04). Using physiology as a reference, radiology had positive and negative predictive values of 44% and 84%, respectively. Rectoceles, cystoceles, enteroceles and pathological pelvic floor descent were not physiologically predictive of animus (P > 0.05). The sphincterial straining pressure was 71 mmHg in the anismus group versus 12 mmHg. Radiology was likely to identify anismus when the straining pressure exceeded 50% of the resting pressure (P = 0.08). Conclusion Radiological techniques detect pelvic morphological abnormalities, but lead to overdiagnoses of anismus. No proctographic pathological feature predicts anismus reliably. A stronger pelvic floor paradoxical contraction is associated with a greater likelihood of detection by proctography.
机译:目的Anismus是一种功能障碍,以阻塞性症状和骨盆底的反常收缩为特征。本研究旨在建立生理学与放射学之间的诊断一致性,将肛门畸形与形态出口阻塞相关联,并探讨括约肌压力和直肠体积在肛门畸形的放射诊断中的作用。方法采用磁共振成像直肠造影/荧光镜下排便造影和肛门直肠生理检查对连续性患者进行评估。形态学放射学特征与生理学检查有关。使用卡方检验进行分类分析,并通过卡伯系数评估一致性。使用Mann-Whitney测试评估患者组之间的直肠体积和括约肌压力分布。结果的P值对43例患者(42例女性患者)进行了肛门直肠生理学和放射学成像。中位年龄为54岁(四分位间距为41.5-60岁)。放射学和生理学上分别观察到18例(41.8%)和12例(27.9%)的肛门畸形。模态之间的一致性为0.298(P = 0.04)。以生理学为参考,放射学的阳性和阴性预测值分别为44%和84%。直肠膨出,膀胱膨出,肠腔膨出和病理性盆底下降并非生理学上对无动物性的预测(P> 0.05)。 Anismus组的括约肌张力为71 mmHg,而十二指肠压力为12 mmHg。当应变压力超过静息压力的50%(P = 0.08)时,放射学很可能会识别出肛门瘘。结论放射学技术可检测盆腔形态异常,但会导致对肛门畸形的过度诊断。没有直肠病理学特征可以可靠地预测肛门畸形。更强的骨盆底自相矛盾的收缩与通过直肠造影术发现的可能性更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号