...
首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine >F-18 fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the diagnosis of avascular necrosis of the femoral head: Comparison with magnetic resonance imaging
【24h】

F-18 fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the diagnosis of avascular necrosis of the femoral head: Comparison with magnetic resonance imaging

机译:F-18氟正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描在股骨头缺血性坏死诊断中的应用:与磁共振成像的比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: Femoral head avascular necrosis (FHAVN) is one of the increasingly common causes of musculoskeletal disability and poses a major diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Although radiography, scintigraphy, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been widely used in the diagnosis of FHAVN, positron emission tomography (PET) has recently been evaluated to assess vascularity of the femoral head. In this study, the authors compared F-18 fluoride PET/CT with MRI in the initial diagnosis of FHAVN. Patients and Methods: We prospectively studied 51 consecutive patients with a high clinical suspicion of FHAVN. All patients underwent MRI and F-18 fluoride PET/CT, the time interval between the two scans being 4-10 (mean 8) days. Two nuclear medicine physicians blinded to the MRI report read the PET/CT scans. Clinical assessment was also done. Final diagnoses were made by surgical pathology or clinical and radiologic follow-up. Results: A final diagnosis of avascular necrosis (AVN) was made in 40 patients. MRI was 96.5% sensitive, 100% specific, and 98.03% accurate while PET/CT was 100% sensitive, specific, and accurate in diagnosing FHAVN. The agreement between the two imaging modalities for the diagnosis of AVN was 96.07%. Conclusion: F-18 fluoride PET/CT showed good agreement with MRI in the initial diagnosis of FHAVN and can be better than MRI in detecting early disease.
机译:目的:股骨头缺血性坏死(FHAVN)是肌肉骨骼残疾日益普遍的原因之一,对诊断和治疗提出了重大挑战。尽管放射线照相,闪烁显像,计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)已广泛用于FHAVN的诊断,但最近已对正电子发射断层扫描(PET)进行了评估,以评估股骨头的血管性。在这项研究中,作者将F-18氟化物PET / CT与MRI在FHAVN的初步诊断中进行了比较。患者和方法:我们前瞻性地研究了51位高度怀疑FHAVN的连续患者。所有患者均接受了MRI和F-18氟化物PET / CT检查,两次扫描之间的时间间隔为4-10天(平均8天)。两名对MRI报告不了解的核医学医生阅读了PET / CT扫描。还进行了临床评估。最终诊断是通过手术病理或临床和放射学随访进行的。结果:对40例患者进行了血管坏死(AVN)的最终诊断。 MRI诊断FHAVN的敏感性为96.5%,特异性为100%和98.03%,而PET / CT的敏感性为100%,特异性和准确。两种影像学诊断AVN的一致性为96.07%。结论:F-18氟化物PET / CT在FHAVN的初步诊断中与MRI具有良好的一致性,在早期发现疾病方面优于MRI。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号