...
首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging >Comparison of MDCT, MRI and MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging in evaluation of focal renal lesions: The defender, challenger, and winner!
【24h】

Comparison of MDCT, MRI and MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging in evaluation of focal renal lesions: The defender, challenger, and winner!

机译:MDCT,MRI和MRI与弥散加权成像在评估局灶性肾病中的比较:防御者,挑战者和胜利者!

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: To compare the diagnostic performance of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the characterization of focal renal lesions. We also compared MDCT and MRI in the staging of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Materials and Methods: One hundred and twenty adult patients underwent MDCT (40-row and 128-row scanners), MRI (at 1.5 T), and DWI (at b-values of 0 and 500 s/mm2) for characterization of 225 renal lesions. There were 65 malignant neoplasms (44 RCCs), 25 benign neoplasms, 25 abscesses, 45 pseudotumors, 15 hemorrhagic cysts, and 50 benign cysts. A composite gold standard including histology, typical imaging criteria, and follow-up imaging was employed. To determine the diagnostic performance of imaging modalities, area-under-curve (AUC) was calculated by receiver-operating-characteristic analysis and compared. Fisher's exact test was used to compare the diagnostic accuracies and confidence levels with MDCT, MRI, and MRI + DWI. Cross-tabulation was used to assess the precision of MDCT and MRI in RCC staging. Results: AUC for MDCT (0.834) and MRI (0.841) in the classification of benign and malignant lesions were within corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) ( P = 0.88) whereas MRI + DWI had significantly better performance (AUC 0.968, P = 0.0002 and 0.0004, respectively). Both CT and MRI had low specificity (66.9% and 68.8%, respectively), which increased substantially with DWI (93.8%) owing to correct diagnosis of pseudotumors. MRI was superior to CT in diagnosing necrotic RCC and hemorrhagic cysts. MRI + DWI had the highest accuracy (94.2%) in assigning the definitive diagnosis and 97.6% lesions were diagnosed with very high confidence, significantly better than CT and MRI. Both CT and MRI had the same accuracy (86.1%) in RCC staging and evaluation of intravascular thrombi. Conclusions: Characterization of renal lesions was most accurate with MRI + DWI. The latter is also the most suitable modality in diagnosing pseudotumors and evaluating patients with renal dysfunction. CT and MRI were equivalent in RCC staging.
机译:目的:比较多探测器计算机断层扫描(MDCT),磁共振成像(MRI)和MRI与弥散加权成像(DWI)对局灶性肾病灶的表征。我们还比较了肾癌(RCC)分期的MDCT和MRI。材料与方法:120例成年患者接受了MDCT(40行和128行扫描仪),MRI(1.5 T)和DWI(b值分别为0和500 s / mm 2 )用于表征225个肾脏病变。有65例恶性肿瘤(44例RCC),25例良性肿瘤,25例脓肿,45例假瘤,15例出血性囊肿和50例良性囊肿。使用包括组织学,典型影像学标准和随访影像学的复合金标准。为了确定成像方式的诊断性能,通过接收器操作特性分析计算并比较了曲线下面积(AUC)。 Fisher的精确检验用于比较MDCT,MRI和MRI + DWI的诊断准确性和置信度。使用交叉表评估RCT分期中MDCT和MRI的准确性。结果:在良性和恶性病变的分类中,MDCT的AUC(0.834)和MRI的AUC(0.841)在相应的95%置信区间(CI)以内(P = 0.88),而MRI + DWI的表现明显更好(AUC 0.968,P =分别为0.0002和0.0004)。 CT和MRI的特异性都较低(分别为66.9%和68.8%),由于对假瘤的正确诊断,DWI的特异性大大提高(93.8%)。在坏死的RCC和出血性囊肿的诊断中,MRI优于CT。 MRI + DWI在确定性诊断中的准确度最高(94.2%),并且诊断出的97.6%病变具有很高的置信度,明显优于CT和MRI。 CT和MRI在RCC分期和评估血管内血栓方面具有相同的准确性(86.1%)。结论:MRI + DWI对肾脏病变的表征最为准确。后者也是诊断假瘤和评估肾功能不全患者的最合适方式。 CT和MRI在RCC分期中是等效的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号