首页> 外文期刊>Implementation Science >Mixed-method study of a conceptual model of evidence-based intervention sustainment across multiple public-sector service settings
【24h】

Mixed-method study of a conceptual model of evidence-based intervention sustainment across multiple public-sector service settings

机译:在多个公共部门服务环境中基于证据的干预维持概念模型的混合方法研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background This study examines sustainment of an EBI implemented in 11 United States service systems across two states, and delivered in 87 counties. The aims are to 1) determine the impact of state and county policies and contracting on EBI provision and sustainment; 2) investigate the role of public, private, and academic relationships and collaboration in long-term EBI sustainment; 3) assess organizational and provider factors that affect EBI reach/penetration, fidelity, and organizational sustainment climate; and 4) integrate findings through a collaborative process involving the investigative team, consultants, and system and community-based organization (CBO) stakeholders in order to further develop and refine a conceptual model of sustainment to guide future research and provide a resource for service systems to prepare for sustainment as the ultimate goal of the implementation process. Methods A mixed-method prospective and retrospective design will be used. Semi-structured individual and group interviews will be used to collect information regarding influences on EBI sustainment including policies, attitudes, and practices; organizational factors and external policies affecting model implementation; involvement of or collaboration with other stakeholders; and outer- and inner-contextual supports that facilitate ongoing EBI sustainment. Document review (e.g., legislation, executive orders, regulations, monitoring data, annual reports, agendas and meeting minutes) will be used to examine the roles of state, county, and local policies in EBI sustainment. Quantitative measures will be collected via administrative data and web surveys to assess EBI reach/penetration, staff turnover, EBI model fidelity, organizational culture and climate, work attitudes, implementation leadership, sustainment climate, attitudes toward EBIs, program sustainment, and level of institutionalization. Hierarchical linear modeling will be used for quantitative analyses. Qualitative analyses will be tailored to each of the qualitative methods (e.g., document review, interviews). Qualitative and quantitative approaches will be integrated through an inclusive process that values stakeholder perspectives. Discussion The study of sustainment is critical to capitalizing on and benefiting from the time and fiscal investments in EBI implementation. Sustainment is also critical to realizing broad public health impact of EBI implementation. The present study takes a comprehensive mixed-method approach to understanding sustainment and refining a conceptual model of sustainment.
机译:背景信息本研究考察了在两个州的11个美国服务系统中实施并在87个县实施的EBI的维持性。目的是:1)确定州和县的政策和合同对EBI提供和维持的影响; 2)研究公共,私人和学术关系以及协作在EBI长期维持中的作用; 3)评估影响EBI到达/渗透,忠诚度和组织维持环境的组织和提供者因素; 4)通过调查团队,顾问,系统和社区组织(CBO)利益相关者的协作过程来整合发现,以便进一步开发和完善可持续性概念模型,以指导未来的研究并为服务系统提供资源准备将维持作为实施过程的最终目标。方法将采用混合方法的前瞻性和回顾性设计。半结构化的个人和小组访谈将用于收集有关对EBI维持的影响的信息,包括政策,态度和做法;影响模型实施的组织因素和外部政策;其他利益相关者的参与或合作;外部和内部上下文支持,可促进持续的EBI维持。文件审查(例如立法,行政命令,法规,监控数据,年度报告,议程和会议纪要)将用于检查州,县和地方政策在EBI维持中的作用。将通过行政数据和网络调查收集量化措施,以评估EBI的覆盖/渗透,人员流动,EBI模型的忠诚度,组织文化和气候,工作态度,实施领导力,维持气候,对EBI的态度,计划维持和制度化水平。分层线性建模将用于定量分析。定性分析将针对每种定性方法(例如,文件审阅,访谈)进行量身定制。定性和定量方法将通过包含利益相关者观点的包容性过程进行整合。讨论可持续性研究对于利用EBI实施中的时间和财政投资并从中受益至关重要。维持对于实现EBI实施对公众健康的广泛影响也至关重要。本研究采用全面的混合方法来理解可持续性并完善可持续性的概念模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号