...
首页> 外文期刊>Implementation Science >Characterising an implementation intervention in terms of behaviour change techniques and theory: the ‘Sepsis Six’ clinical care bundle
【24h】

Characterising an implementation intervention in terms of behaviour change techniques and theory: the ‘Sepsis Six’ clinical care bundle

机译:根据行为改变技术和理论来描述实施干预措施:“ Sepsis Six”临床护理包

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Sepsis is a major cause of death from infection, with a mortality rate of 36 %. This can be halved by implementing the ‘Sepsis Six’ evidence-based care bundle within 1 h of presentation. A UK audit has shown that median implementation rates are 27–47 % and interventions to improve this have demonstrated minimal effects. In order to develop more effective implementation interventions, it is helpful to obtain detailed characterisations of current interventions and to draw on behavioural theory to identify mechanisms of change. The aim of this study was to illustrate this process by using the Behaviour Change Wheel; Behaviour Change Technique (BCT) Taxonomy; Capability, Opportunity, Motivation model of behaviour; and Theoretical Domains Framework to characterise the content and theoretical mechanisms of action of an existing intervention to implement Sepsis Six. Methods Data came from documentary, interview and observational analyses of intervention delivery in several wards of a UK hospital. A broad description of the intervention was created using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication framework. Content was specified in terms of (i) component BCTs using the BCT Taxonomy and (ii) intervention functions using the Behaviour Change Wheel. Mechanisms of action were specified using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation model and the Theoretical Domains Framework. Results The intervention consisted of 19 BCTs, with eight identified using all three data sources. The BCTs were delivered via seven functions of the Behaviour Change Wheel, with four (‘education’, ‘enablement’, ‘training’ and ‘environmental restructuring’) supported by the three data sources. The most frequent mechanisms of action were reflective motivation (especially ‘beliefs about consequences’ and ‘beliefs about capabilities’) and psychological capability (especially ‘knowledge’). Conclusions The intervention consisted of a wide range of BCTs targeting a wide range of mechanisms of action. This study demonstrates the utility of the Behaviour Change Wheel, the BCT Taxonomy and the Theoretical Domains Framework, tools recognised for providing guidance for intervention design, for characterising an existing intervention to implement evidence-based care.
机译:背景脓毒症是感染死亡的主要原因,死亡率为36%。通过在演示后1小时内实施“脓毒症六”循证护理包,可以将其减少一半。英国的一项审计表明,中位数实施率为27%至47%,而改善这一目标的干预措施所产生的影响却很小。为了制定更有效的实施干预措施,有助于获得当前干预措施的详细特征,并借鉴行为理论来识别变化的机制。这项研究的目的是通过使用行为改变轮来说明这一过程。行为改变技术(BCT)分类法;行为能力,机会,动机模型;以及“理论领域框架”,以描述实施第六次败血症的现有干预措施的内容和理论作用机制。方法数据来自英国一家医院多个病房的干预交付情况的文献资料,访谈资料和观察资料。使用干预描述和复制模板创建了对该干预的广泛描述。内容是根据(i)使用BCT分类法的组件BCT和(ii)使用行为变更轮的干预功能指定的。使用能力,机会,动机模型和理论领域框架来指定行动机制。结果干预措施由19个BCT组成,其中使用全部三个数据源确定了8个BCT。 BCT通过“行为改变轮”的七个功能提供,三个数据源支持四个功能(“教育”,“启用”,“培训”和“环境重组”)。最常见的行动机制是反思性动机(尤其是“关于后果的信念”和“关于能力的信念”)和心理能力(尤其是“知识”)。结论干预措施包括针对多种作用机制的多种BCT。这项研究证明了行为改变轮,BCT分类法和理论领域框架的实用性,这些工具被认为可为干预设计提供指导,以表征现有干预以实施循证护理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号