首页> 外文期刊>Implementation Science >A cluster randomized controlled trial comparing three methods of disseminating practice guidelines for children with croup [ISRCTN73394937]
【24h】

A cluster randomized controlled trial comparing three methods of disseminating practice guidelines for children with croup [ISRCTN73394937]

机译:一项集群随机对照试验,比较了三种针对人群的传播实践指南的方法[ISRCTN73394937]

获取原文
       

摘要

Background The optimal management of croup – a common respiratory illness in young children – is well established. In particular, treatment with corticosteroids has been shown to significantly reduce the rate and duration of intubation, hospitalization, and return to care for on-going croup symptoms. Furthermore treatment with a single dose of corticosteroids does not appear to result in any significant adverse outcomes, and yields overall cost-savings for both families and the health care system. However, as has been shown with many other diseases, there is a significant gap between what we know and what we do. The overall aim of this study is to identify, from a societal perspective, the costs and associated benefits of three strategies for implementing a practice guideline that addresses the management of croup. Methods/designs We propose to use a matched pair cluster trial in 24 Alberta hospitals randomized into three intervention groups. We will use mixed methods to assess outcomes including linkage and analysis of administrative databases obtained from Alberta Health and Wellness, retrospective medical chart audit, and prospective telephone surveys of the parents of children diagnosed to have croup. The intervention strategies to be compared will be mailing of printed educational materials (low intensity intervention), mailing plus a combination of interactive educational meetings, educational outreach visits, and reminders (intermediate intensity intervention), and a combination of mailing, interactive sessions, outreach visits, reminders plus identification of local opinion leaders and establishment of local consensus processes (high intensity intervention). The primary objective is to determine which of the three intervention strategies are most effective at lowering the rate of hospital days per 1,000 disease episodes. Secondary objectives are to determine which of the three dissemination strategies are most effective at increasing the use of therapies of known benefit. An economic analysis will be conducted to determine which of the three intervention strategies will most effectively reduce total societal costs including all health care costs, costs borne by the family, and costs stemming from the strategies for disseminating guidelines.
机译:背景技术最佳人群的最佳治疗方法(儿童常见的呼吸系统疾病)已经确立。特别是,皮质类固醇激素治疗已显示可显着降低插管,住院和为持续的臀部症状恢复治疗的速度和持续时间。此外,用单剂量的皮质类固醇激素治疗似乎不会导致任何重大的不良后果,并且可以为家庭和医疗保健系统节省总体成本。但是,正如许多其他疾病所表明的那样,我们所知道的与我们所做的事情之间存在巨大的差距。这项研究的总体目标是从社会角度确定实施针对人群的管理的实践指南的三种策略的成本和相关收益。方法/设计我们建议在24家艾伯塔省医院中采用配对配对研究,将其随机分为三个干预组。我们将使用混合方法评估结果,包括链接和分析从艾伯塔省健康与保健处获得的行政数据库,回顾性病历审核以及对被诊断患有腮腺炎的孩子的父母进行的前瞻性电话调查。进行比较的干预策略是邮寄印刷的教育材料(低强度干预),邮寄以及交互式教育会议,教育外展访问和提醒(中强度干预)的组合,以及邮寄,交互式会议,外展的组合拜访,提醒以及当地舆论领袖的识别和建立当地共识程序(高强度干预)。主要目标是确定三种干预策略中的哪一种对降低每千例疾病发作的住院天数最有效。次要目标是确定三种传播策略中的哪一种在增加已知益处的治疗方法中最有效。将进行经济分析,以确定三种干预策略中的哪一种将最有效地降低总社会成本,包括所有医疗保健成本,家庭负担的成本以及由传播指南的策略产生的成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号