首页> 外文期刊>Implementation Science >Never the twain shall meet? - a comparison of implementation science and policy implementation research
【24h】

Never the twain shall meet? - a comparison of implementation science and policy implementation research

机译:吐温永远不会见面吗? -实施科学与政策实施研究的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Many of society’s health problems require research-based knowledge acted on by healthcare practitioners together with implementation of political measures from governmental agencies. However, there has been limited knowledge exchange between implementation science and policy implementation research, which has been conducted since the early 1970s. Based on a narrative review of selective literature on implementation science and policy implementation research, the aim of this paper is to describe the characteristics of policy implementation research, analyze key similarities and differences between this field and implementation science, and discuss how knowledge assembled in policy implementation research could inform implementation science. Discussion Following a brief overview of policy implementation research, several aspects of the two fields were described and compared: the purpose and origins of the research; the characteristics of the research; the development and use of theory; determinants of change (independent variables); and the impact of implementation (dependent variables). The comparative analysis showed that there are many similarities between the two fields, yet there are also profound differences. Still, important learning may be derived from several aspects of policy implementation research, including issues related to the influence of the context of implementation and the values and norms of the implementers (the healthcare practitioners) on implementation processes. Relevant research on various associated policy topics, including The Advocacy Coalition Framework, Governance Theory, and Institutional Theory, may also contribute to improved understanding of the difficulties of implementing evidence in healthcare. Implementation science is at a relatively early stage of development, and advancement of the field would benefit from accounting for knowledge beyond the parameters of the immediate implementation science literature. Summary There are many common issues in policy implementation research and implementation science. Research in both fields deals with the challenges of translating intentions into desired changes. Important learning may be derived from several aspects of policy implementation research.
机译:背景技术社会上许多健康问题都需要医疗从业人员根据研究知识以及政府机构采取的政治措施来实施。但是,自1970年代初以来,实施科学与政策实施研究之间的知识交流有限。在对有关执行科学和政策实施研究的选择性文献进行叙述性回顾的基础上,本文的目的是描述政策实施研究的特征,分析该领域与实施科学之间的主要异同,并讨论政策中知识的组合方式实施研究可以为实施科学提供信息。讨论在对政策实施研究进行简要概述之后,对这两个领域的几个方面进行了描述和比较:研究的目的和起源;研究的特点;理论的发展和运用;变化的决定因素(独立变量);以及实施的影响(因变量)。比较分析表明,这两个领域之间有很多相似之处,但也存在着深刻的差异。尽管如此,重要的学习还是可以从政策实施研究的多个方面中得出,包括与实施环境的影响以及实施者(医疗从业者)的价值观和规范对实施过程的影响有关的问题。有关各种相关政策主题的相关研究,包括“倡导联盟框架”,“治理理论”和“制度理论”,也可能有助于增进对医疗保健实施证据难度的理解。实施科学还处于发展的早期阶段,该领域的进步将受益于对超出即时实施科学文献范围之外的知识的解释。总结在政策实施研究和实施科学中存在许多常见问题。在这两个领域的研究都面临着将意图转化为预期变化的挑战。重要的学习可能来自政策实施研究的多个方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号