首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine >Comparison of bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic techniques for diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia
【24h】

Comparison of bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic techniques for diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia

机译:支气管镜和非支气管镜诊断呼吸机相关性肺炎的比较

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: The diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) remains a challenge because the clinical signs and symptoms lack both sensitivity and specificity and the selection of microbiologic diagnostic procedure is still a matter of debate. Aims and Objective: To study the role of various bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic diagnostic techniques for diagnosis of VAP. Settings and Design: This prospective comparative study was conducted in a medical ICU of a tertiary care center. Materials and Methods: Twenty-five patients, clinically diagnosed with VAP, were evaluated by bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic procedures for diagnosis. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of various bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic techniques were calculated, taking clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) of ≥6 as reference standard. Results: Our study has shown that for the diagnosis of VAP, bronchoscopic brush had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 94.9% [confidence interval (CI): 70.6-99.7], 57.1% (CI: 13.4-86.1), 85% (CI: 61.1-96) and 80% (CI: 21.9-98.7), respectively. Bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 77.8% (CI: 51.9-92.6), 71.8% (CI: 24.1-94), 87.3% (CI: 60.4-97.8) and 55.5% (CI: 17.4-82.6), respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for non-bronchoscopic BAL (NBAL) were 83.3% (CI: 57.7-95.6), 71.43% (CI: 24.1-94), 88.2% (CI: 62.3-97.4) and 62.5% (CI: 20.2-88.2), respectively. Endotracheal aspirate (ETA) yield was only 52% and showed poor concordance with BAL (k-0.351; P-0.064) and NBAL (k-0.272; P-0.161). There was a good microbiologic concordance among different bronchoscopic and non-bronchoscopic distal airway sampling techniques. Conclusion: NBAL is an inexpensive, easy, and useful technique for microbiologic diagnosis of VAP. Our findings, if verified, might simplify the approach for the diagnosis of VAP.
机译:背景:呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的诊断仍然是一个挑战,因为临床体征和症状缺乏敏感性和特异性,并且微生物学诊断程序的选择仍是一个有争议的问题。目的和目的:研究各种支气管镜和非支气管镜诊断技术在诊断VAP中的作用。设置和设计:这项前瞻性比较研究是在三级护理中心的医疗ICU中进行的。材料与方法:对25例临床诊断为VAP的患者进行了支气管镜和非支气管镜检查,以进行诊断。以≥6的临床肺部感染评分(CPIS)为参考标准,计算了各种支气管镜和非支气管镜技术的敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。结果:我们的研究表明,对于VAP的诊断,支气管镜刷的敏感性,特异性,PPV和NPV分别为94.9%[置信区间(CI):70.6-99.7],57.1%(CI:13.4-86.1),85 %(CI:61.1-96)和80%(CI:21.9-98.7)。支气管镜支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)的敏感性,特异性,PPV和NPV分别为77.8%(CI:51.9-92.6),71.8%(CI:24.1-94),87.3%(CI:60.4-97.8)和55.5%(CI :17.4-82.6)。非支气管镜BAL(NBAL)的敏感性,特异性,PPV和NPV分别为83.3%(CI:57.7-95.6),71.43%(CI:24.1-94),88.2%(CI:62.3-97.4)和62.5%(CI :20.2-88.2)。气管内抽吸物(ETA)的产率仅为52%,与BAL(k-0.351; P-0.064)和NBAL(k-0.272; P-0.161)的一致性较差。在不同的支气管镜和非支气管镜远端气道采样技术之间,微生物学具有良好的一致性。结论:NBAL是一种用于VAP微生物学诊断的廉价,简便且有用的技术。如果得到证实,我们的发现可能会简化VAP的诊断方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号