...
首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Dental Research >Comparison of quality of obturation and post-operative pain using manual vs rotary files in primary teeth - A randomised clinical trial
【24h】

Comparison of quality of obturation and post-operative pain using manual vs rotary files in primary teeth - A randomised clinical trial

机译:使用手动锉刀和旋转锉刀比较乳牙闭锁和术后疼痛的质量-一项随机临床试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Cleaning and shaping plays a very important role in success of root canal procedures. There are various instrumentation techniques available for root canal preparation. Recently, an exclusive rotary file for root canal preparation of primary teeth has been introduced. Aim of the Study: The aim of this in vivo study was to compare the quality of obturation and intensity, and duration of post-operative pain between two rotary file systems with manual files during the pulpectomy of primary molars. Materials and Methods: Forty five primary mandibular molars were included in this study, which was randomly allocated into one of the three experimental groups (n = 15). Group A: Instrumentation was done using Hand K-file; Group B: Instrumentation was done using Kedo-S rotary file system; and Group C: Instrumentation was done using K3 rotary file system. The quality of obturation was recorded as optimal, underfilled, or overfilled using standardized intraoral periapical radiographs. This study also evaluated the intensity and duration of postoperative pain at different time intervals: 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours following the pulpectomy. Results: With respect to quality of obturation, less underfilling was noticed in Kedo-S rotary files (16.7%) followed by using K3 rotary files (33.3%) and hand K files (43.3%). Kedo-S file showed the least underfilled canals (16.7%) and comparatively more overfilled canals (26.6%) and it was statistically significant (P value of 0.001 and 0.002 respectively). On comparing the intensity and duration of postoperative pain among the three groups, there was no statistically significant difference between these groups (P 0.05). Conclusion: Kedo-S pediatric rotary file system shows considerably better quality of obturation when compared to that of K3 rotary and hand K file systems without much of any significant difference in relevance to the post-operative pain.
机译:简介:清洁和整形在成功根管手术中起着非常重要的作用。有多种器械技术可用于根管准备。最近,已经推出了一种专用的旋转锉,用于准备乳齿的根管。研究的目的:这项体内研究的目的是比较初生磨牙切牙术中两个旋转锉系统与手动锉之间的阻塞质量和强度以及术后疼痛的持续时间。材料和方法:本研究包括45个主要的下颌磨牙,将其随机分为三个实验组之一(n = 15)。 A组:使用Hand K文件完成检测; B组:使用Kedo-S旋转锉系统完成检测; C组:使用K3旋转文件系统完成检测。使用标准化的口腔根尖周X光片将闭塞的质量记录为最佳,未充盈或充盈。这项研究还评估了在不同时间间隔(牙髓切除术后6、12、24、48和72小时)的术后疼痛强度和持续时间。结果:关于充填质量,发现Kedo-S旋转锉的未充填量较少(16.7%),随后使用K3旋转锉(33.3%)和手动K锉(43.3%)。 Kedo-S文件显示运河的未满溢最少(16.7%),而运河的过满相对较多(26.6%),具有统计学意义(P值分别为0.001和0.002)。比较三组术后疼痛的强度和持续时间,这三组之间无统计学差异(P> 0.05)。结论:与K3旋转和手动K锉系统相比,Kedo-S儿科旋转锉系统显示的闭孔质量好得多,并且与术后疼痛的相关性没有太大差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号