...
首页> 外文期刊>Asia-Pacific Journal of Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation and Technology >New anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction using a rounded rectangular dilator
【24h】

New anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction using a rounded rectangular dilator

机译:使用圆角矩形扩张器的新解剖单束ACL重建

获取原文

摘要

Background: During the past 10 years, the main trend for ACL reconstruction has shifted to anatomic reconstruction, regardless of single bundle or double bundle techniques. There is no significant difference in the postoperative stability and clinical results between single and double bundle ACL reconstruction. Therefore, attention has returned to single bundle reconstruction with grafts that are placed at the center of anatomical footprint. It is widely accepted that the smaller hamstring autograft size (tunnel diameter < 8mm) is a predictor of poorer clinical results. However, the shortcoming of conventional anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction is that the creation of a large anatomical bone tunnel is not possible because of roof impingement or breakage of posterior femoral bone tunnel in small Asian female. Based on the results of many recent anatomical studies involving the ACL, we should create a femoral bone tunnel in a rounded rectangular shape to approximately reproduce the native tendon-bone junction of the ACL and perform ACL reconstruction using a thick graft, and we have also realized that the cross-sectional shape of the fourfold ST graft was not round, but oval. The rounded rectangular tunnel was more fitted to the graft than the round tunnel Therefore, we created an original femoral dilator and sizing block and developed a new ACL reconstruction technique: “rounded rectangular femoral tunnel ACLR” (RFTR). This study aimed to compare the area of femoral tunnel and clinical results between conventional anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction (ASBR) and RFTR. The hypothesis was that RFTR could have a larger femoral tunnel and improve clinical results.
机译:背景:在过去的10年中,无论单束或双束技术如何,ACL重建的主要趋势已转向解剖学重建。单束和双束ACL重建之间的术后稳定性和临床结果无显着差异。因此,注意力已经转移到放置在解剖足迹中心的移植物进行单束重建。普遍认为较小的绳肌自体移植物大小(隧道直径<8mm)是较差的临床结果的预示因素。然而,传统的解剖单束ACL重建的缺点是,由于屋顶撞击或亚洲女性小股骨后骨隧道的破裂,不可能创建大的解剖骨隧道。根据最近有关ACL的许多解剖学研究的结果,我们应该创建一个圆角矩形的股骨隧道,以大致复制ACL的天然腱-骨接合点,并使用较厚的移植物进行ACL重建,认识到四重ST移植物的横截面形状不是圆形,而是椭圆形。圆形矩形隧道比圆形隧道更适合移植物。因此,我们创建了原始的股骨扩张器和施胶块,并开发了新的ACL重建技术:“圆形矩形股骨隧道ACLR”(RFTR)。这项研究旨在比较常规解剖性单束ACL重建(ASBR)和RFTR之间的股骨隧道面积和临床结果。假设RFTR可能具有更大的股骨隧道并改善临床效果。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号