首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric and oceanic science letters >Carbon Reduction Policies: A Regional Comparison of Their Contributions to CO2 Abatement in Six Carbon Trading Pilot Schemes in China
【24h】

Carbon Reduction Policies: A Regional Comparison of Their Contributions to CO2 Abatement in Six Carbon Trading Pilot Schemes in China

机译:减碳政策:中国六个碳交易试点计划对二氧化碳减排贡献的区域比较

获取原文
       

摘要

The contributions of carbon reduction policies were evaluated and compared for six carbon trading pilot schemes in China, in four municipalities (Beijing, Shanghai, Tianjin, and Chongqing) and two provinces (Guang-dong and Hubei). The carbon emissions accounting method of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change was used to calculate the actual CO_(2) and the support vector machine model was used to predict CO_(2). Chinese carbon reduction policies abated CO_(2) in the six carbon trading pilot schemes after the comprehensive policies came into force. However, the contribution of policies to CO_(2) abatement varied among regions, and the effect of carbon reduction policy on municipality pilot schemes was greater than on provincial pilot schemes. The largest contribution of carbon reduction policy to CO_(2) abatement was 28.3%, for the pilot carbon trading scheme in Beijing, and the smallest contribution was 3.7%, for that in Hubei. It is crucial to consider “carbon leakage” and a carbon trading linking program in order to evaluate the effects of carbon reduction policies.
机译:在中国四个城市(北京,上海,天津和重庆)和两个省(广东和湖北)的六个碳交易试点计划中,评估并比较了碳减排政策的贡献。使用政府间气候变化专门委员会的碳排放核算方法来计算实际的CO_(2),并使用支持向量机模型来预测CO_(2)。全面减排政策生效后,中国的减碳政策在六个碳交易试点计划中削减了CO_(2)。但是,各地区对CO_(2)减排政策的贡献各不相同,减碳政策对市政试点计划的影响大于对省试点计划的影响。对于北京试点碳交易计划,碳减排政策对CO_(2)减排的贡献最大,为28.3%,对湖北省的最小,为3.7%。为了评估减碳政策的效果,考虑“碳泄漏”和碳交易链接计划至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号