...
首页> 外文期刊>Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building >Investigating informality in construction: philosophy, paradigm and practice
【24h】

Investigating informality in construction: philosophy, paradigm and practice

机译:研究建筑中的非正式性:哲学,范式和实践

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The complex interrelationships commonly enacted as a consequence of project team activity take a number of different forms, including those formally dictated by contract conditions. However it is becoming increasingly apparent that project performance is affected by informal relationships, though their investigation is notoriously difficult. This paper proposes that these difficulties arise partly from the nature of the informalities themselves, but also as a consequence of the philosophical position taken by researchers and their consequent methodological/paradigmatic posture, and its impact upon those being studied. It consequently proposes a subjectivist investigative framework that accommodates multiple philosophical points of departure, matching them to a range of alternative methodologies, and indicates the desirability of blending to reflect the peculiarities of each context under investigation. The framework also accommodates the practicalities of putting complex methodologies into action. The paper concludes that this framework presents opportunities to conduct rigorous in-situ investigations of informality at work, leading to authentic and deep insights that would otherwise remain unseen
机译:通常由于项目团队活动而产生的复杂的相互关系采取多种不同形式,包括那些由合同条件正式规定的形式。然而,尽管非正式的调查非常困难,但是项目绩效受非正式关系的影响越来越明显。本文认为,这些困难部分是由于非正式行为本身的性质引起的,也是由于研究人员所持的哲学立场及其随后的方法论/范式立场及其对被研究者的影响所致。因此,它提出了一个主观主义的调查框架,该框架可容纳多个哲学出发点,将它们与一系列可供选择的方法相匹配,并指出需要融合以反映所研究每种情况的特殊性。该框架还包含将复杂的方法论付诸实践的实用性。本文得出的结论是,该框架为开展工作中的非正式性进行严格的现场调查提供了机会,从而获得了真实而深刻的见解,否则这些见解将是看不见的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号