首页> 外文期刊>Asian spine journal. >Patient Reported Outcomes from Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
【24h】

Patient Reported Outcomes from Sacroiliac Joint Fusion

机译:Sa关节融合患者报告的结果

获取原文
           

摘要

Study Design Retrospective, case series. Purpose The purpose of this study is to determine morbidity, complications, and patient reported outcomes from minimally invasive sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fusion. Overview of Literature Lumbar back pain emanating from the SIJ can be surgically treated via a percutaneous approach in the appropriately selected patient with minimal morbidity and acceptable functional outcomes. Methods Patients diagnosed by >2 physical examination maneuvers and subjective relief from a computed tomography–guided lidocaine-bupivacaine-steroid injection underwent SIJ fusion after failing conservative management with a combination of oral anti-inflammatory medications, physical therapy, and pelvic belt stabilization. Perioperative data collected include estimated blood loss (EBL) and operative time. Oswestry disability index, 12-item short form health survey (SF-12), visual analogue score, and functional status were analyzed. All complications were noted. Results The study cohort of 45 cases (69% female) achieved postoperative survey follow-up at 9.9 and 32.3 months. SF-12 physical component summary statistically improved while all other scores were equivalent. Mean EBL and operative time were 22 mL and 36 minutes, respectively. Initial survey showed that 64% of patients discontinued narcotics (29/45), 71% do not use an assistive device (32/45), and 15.6% do not work due to pain (7/45). 73% of patients stated they would have the surgery again (33/45). For the second survey, 65% of patients discontinued narcotics (26/40), 70% did not use an assistive device (28/40), and 17.5% did not work due to pain (7/40). A history of thoracolumbar instrumentation (16/45) did not significantly affect outcomes. Three complications described by screw malposition with neurologic deficit (6.7%) were treated with screw repositioning (1 case) and removal of a single superior implant (2 cases) with time to revision of 2.2 months. All three ultimately had resolution of radicular pain. Conclusions Percutaneous SIJ fusion offers minimal morbidity and acceptable functional outcomes. While women and those with a prior history of lumbar instrumentation may be at increased risk of having SIJ dysfunction requiring surgical intervention, it was not found to affect postoperative functional outcomes when compared to the non-instrumented group.
机译:研究设计回顾,案例系列。目的本研究的目的是确定微创sa关节(SIJ)融合的发病率,并发症和患者报告的结果。从SIJ发出文献腰椎背痛概述可通过以最小的发病率和可接受的功能性结果的适当选择的患者的经皮方法进行手术治疗。方法经过2次以上的体格检查操作诊断出的患者,并通过计算机断层扫描引导的利多卡因-布比卡因-类固醇注射的主观缓解,在保守治疗失败后,口服抗炎药,物理疗法和骨盆带稳定治疗,进行了SIJ融合。围手术期收集的数据包括估计的失血量(EBL)和手术时间。分析了Oswestry残疾指数,12个项目的简短健康调查(SF-12),视觉模拟评分和功能状态。记录所有并发症。结果本研究队列的45例患者(女性占69%)在9.9和32.3个月时接受了术后调查随访。 SF-12物理成分摘要在统计学上有所改善,而所有其他分数均相同。平均EBL和手术时间分别为22 mL和36分钟。初步调查显示,有64%的患者停用了麻醉剂(29/45),71%的患者未使用辅助装置(32/45)和15.6%的患者因疼痛而无法工作(7/45)。 73%的患者表示会再次进行手术(33/45)。在第二次调查中,65%的患者停用了麻醉剂(26/40),70%的患者未使用辅助装置(28/40),17.5%的患者因疼痛而无法工作(7/40)。胸腰椎器械的使用史(16/45)对结局无明显影响。螺钉再定位(1例)和单个上种植体(2例)的移除,将螺钉定位不良伴神经功能缺损(6.7%)治疗的三种并发症进行了治疗,修订时间为2.2个月。这三个人最终都解决了神经痛。结论经皮SIJ融合可将发病率降至最低,并获得可接受的功能结果。尽管女性和有腰椎病史的女性患SIJ功能障碍需要手术干预的风险增加,但与非器械组相比,并未发现它会影响术后功能结局。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号