首页> 外文期刊>Annals of King Edward Medical University. >Pegylated vs. Standard Interferon in Combination with Ribavirin for Genotype 2 and 3 in Chronic Hepatitis C: 10 Years Experience in Local Population
【24h】

Pegylated vs. Standard Interferon in Combination with Ribavirin for Genotype 2 and 3 in Chronic Hepatitis C: 10 Years Experience in Local Population

机译:聚乙二醇化与标准干扰素联合利巴韦林治疗慢性丙型肝炎的基因型2和3的比较:本地人群的10年经验

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective: To compare the response in patients of chronic hepatitis C of genotype 2 and 3 to standard interferon (IFN) plus ribavirin vs. Pegylated interferon plus ribavirin. Type of Study: Cohort type of case series. Setting: Study was based on 10 years data of patients of hepatitis C treated at Garden Clinic Lahore. Patients and Methods: Patients of chronic hepatitis C of genotype 2 and 3 were included and treated with either standard IFN plus ribavirin or peg IFN plus riba-virin for 6 months. Response to therapy was evaluated with qualitative PCR for end of treatment response (ETR) and sustained viral response (SVR). Both gro-ups of patients were compared using chi square test. Results: Total of 609 patients with mean age 39.8 (± 9.37) and male to female ratio 1.67 / 1 (381 / 228) were included. Genotype 3 was seen in 587 (96.4%) patients and genotype 2 in 22 (3.6%). Peg IFN plus ribavirin was given to 51 (8.4%) while 558 (91.6%) patients were treated with standard IFN and ribavirin. Biochemical response was noted in 462 (75.9%) while ETR was seen in 514(84.4%) patients. Relapse was noted in 99 (16.3%) patients, while PCR was negative both at end of treatment and 6 months later in 415 (68.7%) of them. Of patients with positive PCR at end of treatment, 38 had negative PCR 6 months later, while 57 still had positive PCR result. Overall sustai-ned viral response (SVR) was 74.4% (453 / 609). SVR in patients receiving peg IFN was 90.19% (46 / 51) which was significantly better (p value 0.007) than 72.93% (407 / 558), for standard IFN and ribavirin. Conclusion: Pegylated IFN plus ribavirin had better response in patients of chronic hepatitis C with geno-type 2 and 3 as compared to standard IFN plus riba-virin.
机译:目的:比较基因型2和3的慢性丙型肝炎患者对标准干扰素(IFN)加利巴韦林与聚乙二醇化干扰素加利巴韦林的反应。研究类型:病例组的同类研究类型。地点:该研究基于拉合尔花园诊所治疗的丙型肝炎患者的10年数据。患者和方法:纳入基因型2和3的慢性丙型肝炎患者,并用标准IFN加利巴韦林或peg IFN加利巴韦林治疗6个月。用定性PCR评估对治疗的反应的治疗结束反应(ETR)和持续病毒反应(SVR)。使用卡方检验比较患者的两个组。结果:共纳入609名患者,平均年龄39.8(±9.37),男女之比为1.67 / 1(381/228)。基因型3见于587名患者中(96.4%),基因型2见于22名患者中(3.6%)。 51例(8.4%)接受Peg IFN加利巴韦林治疗,而558例(91.6%)患者接受标准IFN和利巴韦林治疗。在462(75.9%)位患者中发现了生化反应,而在514(84.4%)位患者中发现了ETR。观察到99例(16.3%)患者复发,而在治疗结束时和6个月后,其中415例(68.7%)PCR均为阴性。在治疗结束时PCR阳性的患者中,有38例在6个月后PCR阴性,而57例仍具有阳性PCR结果。总体持续病毒应答(SVR)为74.4%(453/609)。接受peg IFN的患者的SVR为90.19%(46/51),比标准IFN和利巴韦林的72.93%(407/558)显着更好(p值0.007)。结论:与标准IFN加利巴韦林相比,聚乙二醇干扰素加利巴韦林对2型和3型基因型慢性丙型肝炎患者有更好的反应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号