...
首页> 外文期刊>Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia >Axial penile rigidity influences patient and partner satisfaction after penile prosthesis implantation
【24h】

Axial penile rigidity influences patient and partner satisfaction after penile prosthesis implantation

机译:阴茎假体植入后,轴向阴茎刚度会影响患者和伴侣的满意度

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Penile prosthesis implantation is one of the treatment choices that is kept for patients who were not satisfied with other treatments. Although penile prosthesis satisfaction rates are higher, there are some dissatisfied patients. The patients’ reasons are mostly shortness and softness of implanted prosthesis. It was previously demonstrated that penile axial rigidity of more than 500 grams is enough for successful vaginal intromission. To our knowledge, there is no study comparing axial rigidity of penile prosthesis and satisfaction. Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine whether axial rigidity of penile prosthesis had impact on patient and partner satisfaction. Materials and Methods: We enrolled one hundred patients who were implanted penile prosthesis before to evaluate their penile axial rigidity. We used Rigidometry (by using the digital inflection rigidometer) to assess the minimal axial pressure to bend the implanted penis. Results: We demonstrated that mean axial pressure to bend the implanted penis was 984.8 ± 268.7 grams. Overall satisfaction score with the penile prosthesis implant was 4.55 and 4.49 (out of 5) in patients and partners, respectively. In total, seven men were unsatisfied with their implant and reported a mean satisfaction score of 0.6 ± 0.48 (out of 5). All prostheses types showed good and more than 500 grams axial rigidity. The patients with Ambicor type, which were buckled at about 710.5 grams, showed worse satisfaction rates in comparison to other prostheses in two patients. Digital inflection rigidometer results of other penile prosthesis types in unsatisfied patient were 842.0, 872.0, 887.0 and 920 g. in CX700, Titan, Genesis and Titan OTR, respectively. Conclusion: We demonstrated that dissatisfaction rate was highest in Ambicor prosthesis implanted patients. Additionally, patients with 3-piece penile prosthesis were more satisfied than 2-piece or malleable ones, interestingly, although some cases had lower axial rigidity results.
机译:简介:阴茎假体植入是不满意其他治疗方法的患者的治疗选择之一。尽管阴茎假体的满意率较高,但仍有一些患者不满意。患者的原因主要是植入的假体短而柔软。先前已证明,超过500克的阴茎轴向刚度足以成功插入阴道。据我们所知,尚无研究比较阴茎假体的轴向刚度和满意度。目的:本研究的目的是检查阴茎假体的轴向刚度是否对患者和伙伴的满意度产生影响。材料和方法:我们招募了100位在植入阴茎假体之前进行评估的患者,以评估其阴茎轴向刚度。我们使用Rigidometry(通过使用数字变形刚度计)评估弯曲植入的阴茎的最小轴向压力。结果:我们证明,弯曲植入阴茎的平均轴向压力为984.8±268.7克。患者和伴侣对阴茎假体植入物的总体满意度分别为4.55和4.49(满分5分)。共有7名男性对其植入物不满意,平均满意度得分为0.6±0.48(满分5分)。所有假体均显示出良好的轴向刚度,并且超过500克。屈曲约710.5克的Ambicor型患者与其他2名患者的假体相比,满意度较低。在不满意的患者中,其他阴茎假体类型的数字屈折硬度计结果为842.0、872.0、887.0和920 g。分别在CX700,Titan,Genesis和Titan OTR中使用。结论:我们证明,Ambicor假体植入患者的不满意率最高。此外,有趣的是,三片式阴茎假体患者比两片式或延展性假体患者更满意,尽管有些病例的轴向刚度较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号