首页> 外文期刊>Annals of laboratory medicine. >Determination of the Prevalence of Aspirin and Clopidogrel Resistances in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease by using Various Platelet-function Tests
【24h】

Determination of the Prevalence of Aspirin and Clopidogrel Resistances in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease by using Various Platelet-function Tests

机译:使用多种血小板功能试验确定冠心病患者阿司匹林和氯吡格雷抵抗的发生率

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Dual therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel has emerged as the gold standard therapy for patients treated with drug-eluting stents (DES). However, there is variability in patients’ responses to this antiplatelet therapy, and some patients continue to show ischemic recurrences after therapy. The purpose of the study was to compare the simultaneously obtained results of various plateletfunction tests for assessing the prevalence of antiplatelet resistance in coronary artery disease patients undergoing DES therapy. Methods: A total of 66 patients were administered a loading dose of aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol at least 12 hr before stenting. The results of VerifyNow (Accumetrics, USA), multiplate analyzer (Dynabyte Medical, Germany), and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein/P2Y12 (Biocytex, France) assays were compared with those of light transmission aggregometry (LTA) analysis. Results: The P2Y12 reaction units and P2Y12% inhibition values obtained using the VerifyNow assay showed strong correlation (r) with the results of the LTA analysis. All tests results showed low concordance in defining the antiplatelet resistance in patients, and the degrees of agreement were as follows: 0 for aspirin reaction units; 0.25, P2Y12% inhibition; 0, aspirin-sensitive patients’ identification test; 0.21, ADPtest; and 0.14, platelet reactivity index, expressed as the k statistics. The prevalence of aspirin and clopidogrel resistances in patients resulted in remarkable variations, from 0% to 22.7% and from 9.1% to 48.5%, respectively. Conclusions: The clinical usefulness of the different assays for the correct classification of patients in terms of antiplatelet resistance remains unclear. Further studies are required to determine the best method for correlating the occurrences of adverse ischemic events.
机译:背景:阿司匹林和氯吡格雷双重疗法已成为使用药物洗脱支架(DES)治疗的患者的金标准疗法。但是,患者对这种抗血小板治疗的反应存在差异,并且一些患者在治疗后仍表现出缺血性复发。这项研究的目的是比较各种血小板功能测试同时获得的结果,以评估接受DES治疗的冠心病患者抗血小板抵抗的发生率。方法:总共66例患者在置入支架前至少12小时接受了阿司匹林,氯吡格雷和西洛他唑的负荷剂量治疗。将VerifyNow(美国Accumetrics公司),多板分析仪(Dynabyte Medical,德国)和血管扩张剂刺激的磷蛋白/ P2Y12(Biocytex,法国)分析的结果与透光聚集法(LTA)分析的结果进行了比较。结果:使用VerifyNow分析获得的P2Y12反应单位和P2Y12%抑制值与LTA分析的结果显示出很强的相关性(r)。所有测试结果均显示出在确定患者抗血小板抵抗性方面的一致性较低,一致性程度如下:阿司匹林反应单位为0;阿司匹林反应单位为0。 0.25,P2Y12%抑制; 0,对阿司匹林敏感的患者的鉴定测试; 0.21,ADPtest;血小板反应性指数0.14,以k统计值表示。患者中阿司匹林和氯吡格雷抵抗的患病率导致显着变化,分别从0%到22.7%和从9.1%到48.5%。结论:就抗血小板药性而言,不同检测方法对患者正确分类的临床用途尚不清楚。需要进行进一步的研究以确定与不良缺血事件发生相关的最佳方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号