【24h】

Online ISSN:

机译:在线ISSN:

获取原文
           

摘要

This paper compares financial costs and benefits of floating rice-based and intensive rice farming systems using data from focus group discussions and household survey in four locations in the Mekong Delta. We argue that the net financial benefit per 1000m2 of integrated floating rice-based farming systems is greater than the net financial benefit of intensive rice farming system. The total net benefit of floating rice-leeks shows the highest net benefit (VND 24.8 mil./1000 m2), followed by floating rice-sweet corn- two baby corn crops and cattle systems (VND 18.5 mil./1000m2), and floating rice-chili (VND 16.7-17.7 mil./1000m2). If farmers cultivate monoculture of rice either two or three crops, the net benefits are ranging from VND 2.2-4.8 mil./1000m2 respectively. Alternatively, farmers integrate vegetables; the net benefit was ranging from VND 5.6 to 11.7 mil./1000m2. The net benefit of the two rice crops is lowest (VND 1.3-2.3 mil./1000m2). Surprisingly, if farmers convert from two intensive rice crops to two maize crops, the net benefit can reach to VND 21 million/1000m2. The results support the argument that the floating rice based systems allows farmers diversified into profitable upland crops, which can help farmers to improve their total income. 
机译:本文使用焦点小组讨论和湄公河三角洲四个地区的家庭调查数据,比较了以浮动稻谷为基础的和集约化水稻种植系统的财务成本和收益。我们认为,每1000平方米的综合浮动水稻种植农业系统的净财务收益要大于集约化水稻种植系统的净财务收益。浮动稻米韭葱的总净收益显示最高的净收益(1000万越南盾2480万越南盾),其次是水稻-甜玉米-两种玉米婴儿作物和牛系统的浮动(1000万越南盾1850万越南盾)。水稻辣椒(1000越南盾16.7-1770万越南盾)。如果农民以两种或三种作物种植水稻,则其净收益分别为220-480万越南盾/ 1000m2。另外,农民可以种植蔬菜。净收益为每1000平方米5.6越南盾到1170万越南盾。两种稻米作物的净收益最低(每1000平方米130-230万越南盾)。出乎意料的是,如果农民从两种集约稻谷作物转变为两种玉米作物,则净收益可达到2100万越南盾/ 1000m2。结果支持这样一个论点,即基于浮动稻米的系统使农民多样化成为有利可图的旱地作物,这可以帮助农民提高其总收入。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号