首页> 外文期刊>Annals of King Edward Medical University. >Comparison of Kaltenborn Segmental Traction Versus Mechanical Cervical Traction for the Management of Cervical Spondylosis
【24h】

Comparison of Kaltenborn Segmental Traction Versus Mechanical Cervical Traction for the Management of Cervical Spondylosis

机译:Kaltenborn节段性牵引与机械性颈椎牵引治疗颈椎病的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Back ground: Cervical spondylosis is the most common degenerative condition of the cervical spine?affecting the intervertebral joints and diss. Mechanical stresses increase load which leads to formation of?osteophytes as a result of the vertebral body's attempt to grow more bone for strengthening. Changes inintervertebral disks can cause spinal cord compression in advanced cases. There are many evidences found?in the literature about non-invasive treatment for cervical spondylosis with the exception of manual therapy.Methodology: Single blinded, randomized clinical trial was conducted at National Hospital & Medical Center DHA Lahore with a sample of 80 patients. After randomization, the subjects were distributed into?two equalgroups of 40 subjects. Group A was treated by applying kaltenborn segmental traction (KST), core stability exercises (CSE) and short wave diathermy (SWD), while Group B was treated with Mechanical cervical traction (MCT), core stability exercises (CSE) and short wave diathermy (SWD). The?duration of treatment was 4 weeks with 3 sessions per week. All patients were assessed at the start of?treatment and then by second and fourth week by using the neck disability index (NDI). Independent t test was used to see the comparative effect of KST and MCT in terms of functional ability with p ≤0.05 % (level of significance).Results: The results illustrate that the measured mean score of NDI before treatment for KST group was?3.97 and for MCT group was 3.92. While mean score of NDI after treatment for KST group was 1.50 and?for MCT group was 2.30. It was noted that there was a difference between mean scores for KST and MCTgroups after treatment with better improvement in KST group (the lower the mean value was an indication?of good functional ability on NDI scale).The measured “p” value of NDI was 0.000, which was an?indication of significant changes proved as in mean scores.Conclusion: This study concluded that kalten born segmental traction(KST) shows more satisfactory?results than mechanical cervical traction (MCT) in subjects of cervical spondylosis for resuming their?functional status in terms of NDI.
机译:背景:颈椎病是颈椎最常见的退行性病变,影响椎间关节和疾病。机械应力会增加载荷,这会导致椎骨形成,这是由于椎体试图长出更多的骨头来进行加固的结果。在晚期情况下,椎间盘的变化会导致脊髓受压。在文献中,有很多证据表明除手动疗法外,非侵入性治疗颈椎病。方法:在DHA拉合尔国家医院和医学中心进行的单盲,随机临床试验,共80例患者。随机分组后,将受试者分为两组,每组40个受试者。 A组采用卡尔滕伯恩分段牵引(KST),核心稳定性锻炼(CSE)和短波透热疗法(SWD)治疗,而B组则采用机械颈椎牵引(MCT),核心稳定性锻炼(CSE)和短波透热疗法治疗(SWD)。治疗时间为4周,每周3次。所有患者均在治疗开始时进行评估,然后在第二和第四周使用颈部残疾指数(NDI)进行评估。用独立t检验观察KST和MCT在功能能力方面的比较效果,p≤0.05%(显着性水平)。结果:结果表明,KST组治疗前NDI的平均得分为?3.97?而MCT组为3.92。 KST组治疗后NDI的平均得分为1.50,MCT组为2.30。值得注意的是,治疗后KST组和MCT组的平均评分之间存在差异,KST组的改善更好(平均值越低表示NDI量表的功能能力良好)。NDI的“ p”测量值是0.000,这表明在平均分方面有显着变化。结论:本研究得出的结论是,在颈椎病患者中,卡尔滕出生的分段牵引力(KST)显示出比机械颈椎牵引力(MCT)更令人满意的结果在NDI方面的功能状态。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号