...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of laboratory medicine. >Removing Lipemia in Serum/Plasma Samples: A Multicenter Study
【24h】

Removing Lipemia in Serum/Plasma Samples: A Multicenter Study

机译:去除血清/血浆样品中的血脂:一项多中心研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Lipemia, a significant source of analytical errors in clinical laboratory settings, should be removed prior to measuring biochemical parameters. We investigated whether lipemia in serum/plasma samples can be removed using a method that is easier and more practicable than ultracentrifugation, the current reference method. Methods Seven hospital laboratories in Spain participated in this study. We first compared the effectiveness of ultracentrifugation (108,200× g ) and high-speed centrifugation (10,000× g for 15 minutes) in removing lipemia. Second, we compared high-speed centrifugation with two liquid-liquid extraction methods—LipoClear (StatSpin, Norwood, USA), and 1,1,2-trichlorotrifluoroethane (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). We assessed 14 biochemical parameters: serum/plasma concentrations of sodium ion, potassium ion, chloride ion, glucose, total protein, albumin, creatinine, urea, alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyl transferase, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate-aminotransferase, calcium, and bilirubin. We analyzed whether the differences between lipemia removal methods exceeded the limit for clinically significant interference (LCSI). Results When ultracentrifugation and high-speed centrifugation were compared, no parameter had a difference that exceeded the LCSI. When high-speed centrifugation was compared with the two liquid-liquid extraction methods, we found differences exceeding the LCSI in protein, calcium, and aspartate aminotransferase in the comparison with 1,1,2-trichlorotrifluoroethane, and in protein, albumin, and calcium in the comparison with LipoClear. Differences in other parameters did not exceed the LCSI. Conclusions High-speed centrifugation (10,000× g for 15 minutes) can be used instead of ultracentrifugation to remove lipemia in serum/plasma samples. LipoClear and 1,1,2-trichlorotrifluoroethane are unsuitable as they interfere with the measurement of certain parameters.
机译:背景血脂是临床实验室设置中分析错误的重要来源,应在测量生化参数之前将其清除。我们调查了是否可以使用比当前参考方法超速离心更容易,更实用的方法去除血清/血浆样品中的血脂。方法西班牙的七个医院实验室参加了这项研究。我们首先比较了超速离心(108,200×g)和高速离心(10,000×g持续15分钟)去除血脂的效果。其次,我们将高速离心与两种液-液萃取方法(LipoClear(StatSpin,美国诺伍德),和1,1,2-三氯三氟乙烷(Merck,达姆施塔特,德国))进行了比较。我们评估了14个生化参数:血清/血浆中钠离子,钾离子,氯离子,葡萄糖,总蛋白,白蛋白,肌酐,尿素,碱性磷酸酶,γ-谷氨酰转移酶,丙氨酸氨基转移酶,天冬氨酸-氨基转移酶,钙和胆红素的浓度。我们分析了去除血脂的方法之间的差异是否超过了临床显着干扰(LCSI)的极限。结果当比较超速离心和高速离心时,没有参数的差异超过LCSI。将高速离心与两种液-液萃取方法进行比较,我们发现与1,1,2-三氯三氟乙烷相比,蛋白质,钙和天冬氨酸转氨酶的差异超过了LCSI,蛋白质,白蛋白和钙的差异也超过了LCSI。与LipoClear比较。其他参数的差异不超过LCSI。结论可以使用高速离心(10,000×g,15分钟)代替超速离心来去除血清/血浆样品中的血脂。 LipoClear和1,1,2-三氯三氟乙烷不适合使用,因为它们会干扰某些参数的测量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号