首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric chemistry and physics >Secondary organic aerosol formation in biomass-burning plumes: theoretical analysis of lab studies and ambient plumes
【24h】

Secondary organic aerosol formation in biomass-burning plumes: theoretical analysis of lab studies and ambient plumes

机译:生物质燃烧烟羽中的次级有机气溶胶形成:实验室研究和环境烟羽的理论分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Secondary organic aerosol (SOA) has been shown to form in biomass-burning emissions in laboratory and field studies. However, there is significant variability among studies in mass enhancement, which could be due to differences in fuels, fire conditions, dilution, and/or limitations of laboratory experiments and observations. This study focuses on understanding processes affecting biomass-burning SOA formation in laboratory smog-chamber experiments and in ambient plumes. Vapor wall losses have been demonstrated to be an important factor that can suppress SOA formation in laboratory studies of traditional SOA precursors; however, impacts of vapor wall losses on biomass-burning SOA have not yet been investigated. We use an aerosol-microphysical model that includes representations of volatility and oxidation chemistry to estimate the influence of vapor wall loss on SOA formation observed in the FLAME?III smog-chamber studies. Our simulations with base-case assumptions for chemistry and wall loss predict a mean OA mass enhancement (the ratio of final to initial OA mass, corrected for particle-phase wall losses) of 1.8 across all experiments when vapor wall losses are modeled, roughly matching the mean observed enhancement during FLAME?III. The mean OA enhancement increases to over 3 when vapor wall losses are turned off, implying that vapor wall losses reduce the apparent SOA formation. We find that this decrease in the apparent SOA formation due to vapor wall losses is robust across the ranges of uncertainties in the key model assumptions for wall-loss and mass-transfer coefficients and chemical mechanisms.brbrWe then apply similar assumptions regarding SOA formation chemistry and physics to smoke emitted into the atmosphere. In ambient plumes, the plume dilution rate impacts the organic partitioning between the gas and particle phases, which may impact the potential for SOA to form as well as the rate of SOA formation. We add Gaussian dispersion to our aerosol-microphysical model to estimate how SOA formation may vary under different ambient-plume conditions (e.g., fire size, emission mass flux, atmospheric stability). Smoke from small fires, such as typical prescribed burns, dilutes rapidly, which drives evaporation of organic vapor from the particle phase, leading to more effective SOA formation. Emissions from large fires, such as intense wildfires, dilute slowly, suppressing OA evaporation and subsequent SOA formation in the near field. We also demonstrate that different approaches to the calculation of OA enhancement in ambient plumes can lead to different conclusions regarding SOA formation. OA mass enhancement ratios of around 1 calculated using an inert tracer, such as black carbon or CO, have traditionally been interpreted as exhibiting little or no SOA formation; however, we show that SOA formation may have greatly contributed to the mass in these plumes.brbrIn comparison of laboratory and plume results, the possible inconsistency of OA enhancement between them could be in part attributed to the effect of chamber walls and plume dilution. Our results highlight that laboratory and field experiments that focus on the fuel and fire conditions also need to consider the effects of plume dilution or vapor losses to walls.
机译:在实验室和现场研究中,已证明次级有机气溶胶(SOA)在燃烧生物质的排放物中形成。但是,在质量增强研究之间存在显着差异,这可能是由于燃料,着火条件,稀释度和/或实验室实验和观察结果的限制所致。这项研究的重点是在实验室烟雾试验和环境羽流中了解影响生物量燃烧SOA形成的过程。在传统的SOA前体的实验室研究中,蒸汽壁损失已被证明是可以抑制SOA形成的重要因素。但是,尚未研究蒸气壁损失对燃烧生物质SOA的影响。我们使用气溶胶微物理模型,其中包括挥发性和氧化化学的表示,以评估蒸气壁损失对FLAME?III烟雾室研究中观察到的SOA形成的影响。在对蒸气壁损失进行建模的所有实验中,我们的模拟基于化学和壁损失的基本假设假设,预测所有实验中平均OA质量增强(最终OA重量与初始OA重量之比,已校正颗粒相壁损失)为1.8,大致匹配在FLAME?III中观察到的平均增强。关闭蒸气壁损耗时,平均OA增强值增加到3以上,这意味着蒸气壁损耗会减少表观SOA的形成。我们发现,由于壁损失和传质系数以及化学机理的关键模型假设中的不确定性范围较大,在整个不确定性范围内,由于蒸汽壁损失而导致的表观SOA形成的减少是有力的。关于SOA形成化学和物理原理的假设,这些化学和物理原理是将烟雾排放到大气中。在环境羽流中,羽流稀释率会影响气相和颗粒相之间的有机分配,这可能会影响SOA形成的可能性以及SOA的形成速度。我们在气溶胶微物理模型中添加了高斯色散,以估算SOA形成在不同的环境-烟雾条件下(例如火势,排放质量通量,大气稳定性)如何变化。小火(例如典型的规定性烧伤)产生的烟雾迅速稀释,这促使有机蒸气从颗粒相中蒸发,从而导致更有效的SOA形成。大火(例如强烈的野火)的排放缓慢地稀释,从而抑制了OA蒸发以及随后在近场中形成SOA。我们还证明,计算环境羽流中OA增强的不同方法可以得出关于SOA形成的不同结论。传统上,使用惰性示踪剂(如黑碳或CO)计算出的OA质量增强比约为1,而SOA形成很少或没有。但是,我们表明SOA的形成可能对这些羽状物的质量起了很大的作用。 比较实验室和羽状物的结果,它们之间OA增强的可能不一致可能部分归因于腔室的影响。壁和羽流稀释。我们的结果表明,着重于燃料和火灾条件的实验室和野外实验还需要考虑羽流稀释或蒸汽损失到壁上的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号