...
首页> 外文期刊>Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research >EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ADALIMUMAB VERSUS INFLIXIMAB IN PATIENTS SUFFERED FROM MODERATE TO SEVERE ACTIVE ULCERATIVE COLITIS
【24h】

EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ADALIMUMAB VERSUS INFLIXIMAB IN PATIENTS SUFFERED FROM MODERATE TO SEVERE ACTIVE ULCERATIVE COLITIS

机译:中度至重度活动性溃疡性结肠炎患者阿达木单抗抗炎西单抗的疗效和安全性

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an idiopathic, chronic inflammatory disease of the large intestine, usually involving the rectum. During the last decade, clinical trials have shown adalimumab (ADA) and infliximab (IFX) to be efficacious in inducing and maintaining remission for moderate to severe UC refractory to the conventional therapies. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ADA and IFX for induction remission in Iraqi patients with moderately to severely active UC. Methods: A total of 50 patients with moderate to severe UC, who were refractory to concurrent treatment with oral corticosteroids and/or immune suppressants, were randomly assigned in 1:1 ratio to receive either ADA (160/80 mg, subcutaneous) or IFX (5 mg/kg, intravenous) during the induction phase (8 weeks). Primary efficacy endpoint was clinical remission at week 8. Secondary efficacy endpoints were the clinical response, mucosal healing, subscores indicative of mild disease (rectal bleeding subscore [RBS], physician’s global assessment [PGA] subscore, and stool frequency subscore [SFS]). Partial Mayo score was also evaluated in addition to the inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire (IBDQ). Additional subgroup analysis was based on the Mayo score, extensive colitis, concomitant medications, high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) level, and patient weight at baseline. The safety profile was assessed in all enrolled patients. Results: At week 8, 24% of patients receiving ADA were in clinical remission, compared with 28% on IFX (p>0.05). Clinical response was achieved in 48% of patients receiving ADA and 52% of patients on IFX (p>0.05). Mucosal healing was achieved in 40% of patients receiving either ADA or IFX (p>0.05). For the subscores indicative of mild disease (≤1), the patients % of RBS and PGA was significantly higher within IFX group (p0.05). The patients with higher Mayo score (≥10), higher hs-CRP (≥10 mg/L), and higher weight (≥70 kg) at baseline were associated with reduced remission rates. ADA and IFX treatment were generally well-tolerated and the overall safety profile matched. Conclusion: ADA and IFX were comparable in their effectiveness for inducing clinical remission and response in patients with moderate to severe UC. Both of the biologic agents were well tolerated with an approach safety profile. Keywords: Ulcerative colitis, Adalimumab, Infliximab, Clinical remission, Safety profile.
机译:目的:溃疡性结肠炎(UC)是大肠的一种特发性慢性炎症性疾病,通常累及直肠。在过去的十年中,临床试验表明,阿达木单抗(ADA)和英夫利昔单抗(IFX)在诱导和维持中度至重度UC难治性UC缓解方面有效。这项研究的目的是比较ADA和IFX对伊拉克中度至重度活动性UC患者的诱导缓解的疗效和安全性。方法:总共50例中度至重度UC患者,在口服皮质类固醇和/或免疫抑制剂的同时治疗中难治,按1:1比例随机分配接受ADA(160/80 mg,皮下)或IFX (5 mg / kg,静脉内)在诱导阶段(8周)。主要功效终点为第8周的临床缓解。次要功效终点为临床反应,粘膜愈合,指示轻度疾病的亚评分(直肠出血亚评分[RBS],医师总体评估[PGA]亚评分和大便频率亚评分[SFS]) 。除炎症性肠病问卷(IBDQ)外,还评估了部分Mayo评分。附加的亚组分析基于Mayo评分,广泛性结肠炎,伴随用药,高敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)水平和基线患者体重。在所有入组患者中评估安全性。结果:在第8周,接受ADA的患者中有24%处于临床缓解期,而IFX则为28%(p> 0.05)。 48%的ADA患者和52%的IFX患者达到了临床反应(p> 0.05)。在接受ADA或IFX的患者中,有40%的患者实现了粘膜愈合(p> 0.05)。对于指示轻度疾病(≤1)的子评分,IFX组中RBS和PGA的患者百分比显着更高(p0.05)。基线时Mayo评分较高(≥10),hs-CRP较高(≥10mg / L)和体重较高(≥70kg)的患者与缓解率降低相关。 ADA和IFX治疗通常耐受性良好,总体安全性相匹配。结论:ADA和IFX在诱导中度至重度UC患者的临床缓解和反应方面具有可比性。两种生物制剂均具有良好的耐受性和进场安全性。关键词:溃疡性结肠炎,阿达木单抗,英夫利昔单抗,临床缓解,安全性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号