...
首页> 外文期刊>Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research >COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF INSULIN, SULFONYLUREA, AND SULFONYLUREA– METFORMIN IN TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS
【24h】

COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF INSULIN, SULFONYLUREA, AND SULFONYLUREA– METFORMIN IN TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS

机译:胰岛素,磺酰脲和磺酰脲二甲双胍在2型糖尿病患者中的成本效益分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: This study aims to compare the cost-effectiveness of insulin therapy, sulfonylureas, and combination of sulfonylureas-metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Sitanala Hospital, Tangerang. Methods: This study employed a cross-sectional to examine the effectiveness and cost of different treatments for Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) among outpatients at Dr. Sitanala Leprosy Hospital in Tangerang, using cost-effectiveness analysis. Participants had consumed the same drug over the past 4 months and were divided into three groups, as follows: An insulin group (n=29), sulfonylurea group (n=29), and sulfonylurea–metformin combination group (n=39). The effectiveness of treatment was evaluated by considering Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) values. The measured cost was direct medical cost. Results: The results showed that there were more female patients (65.96%) than male patients with T2DM, and their average age was 50-59 years. The highest effectiveness was shown in combination in the sulfonylurea–metformin group, with an HbA1c level of 7.48±1.89, although the difference was not statistically significant. The direct medical cost of sulfonylurea monotherapy was significantly lower than that of the other therapies. The average cost-to-effectiveness ratio in the insulin group was Rp. 40,866 that in the sulfonylurea group was Rp. 1,369 and that in the combination of sulfonylurea–metformin group was Rp. 2,621 per percentage of effectivity. The incremental cost-to-effectiveness ratio for the sulfonylurea–metformin to sulfonylurea monotherapy treatment was Rp. 16,194 per percentage effectivity. Conclusion: Based on the analysis performed, sulfonylurea–metformin combination therapy was more cost-effective than either sulfonylurea or insulin monotherapy.
机译:目的:本研究旨在比较坦格朗西塔纳拉医院胰岛素治疗,磺脲类药物和磺酰脲类二甲双胍联合治疗2型糖尿病患者的成本效益。方法:本研究采用成本效益分析方法,通过横断面检查了坦格朗西塔纳拉麻风病医院门诊患者不同治疗2型糖尿病(T2DM)的有效性和成本。在过去的四个月中,参与者服用了相同的药物,分为三组:胰岛素组(n = 29),磺酰脲组(n = 29)和磺酰脲-二甲双胍联合组(n = 39)。通过考虑血红蛋白A1c(HbA1c)值评估治疗效果。测得的费用为直接医疗费用。结果:结果表明,女性患者(65.96%)比男性T2DM患者多,平均年龄为50-59岁。磺酰脲类-二甲双胍组联合用药效果最高,HbA1c水平为7.48±1.89,尽管差异无统计学意义。磺脲类药物单一疗法的直接医疗费用明显低于其他疗法。胰岛素组的平均成本效益比为Rp。 40,866个磺酰脲类药物为Rp。 1,369,磺脲类药物-二甲双胍联合用药组的Rp。 2,621 /有效百分比。磺酰脲-二甲双胍与磺酰脲单药治疗的增量成本-效果比为Rp。每有效度16,194。结论:根据所进行的分析,磺酰脲-二甲双胍联合治疗比磺酰脲或胰岛素单一疗法更具成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号