首页> 外文期刊>Asian Journal of Medical Sciences >A Review of Malaria Diagnostic Tools: Microscopy and Rapid Diagnostic Test
【24h】

A Review of Malaria Diagnostic Tools: Microscopy and Rapid Diagnostic Test

机译:疟疾诊断工具综述:显微镜和快速诊断测试

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: Microscopic detection of parasites has been the reference standard for malaria diagnosis for decades. However, difficulty in maintaining required technical skills and infrastructure has spurred the development of non-microscopic malaria rapid diagnostic devices based on the detection of malaria parasite antigen. We evaluated the QDx MALARIA PAN/Pf rapid immunochromatograpic card test by comparing it with the conventional standard blood smear method for the detection of malaria. Material & Methods: A total of 325 specimens of blood from cases of fever (falciparum malaria 88, vivax malaria 168, mixed infection of falciparum and vivax malaria 44, controls 25) were investigated by QDx Malaria Rapid test and blood smear method. Results: The QDx Malaria Rapid test showed 96.6% sensitivity, 100% specificity and 96.9 % accuracy. However, these parameters were lower when the parasitaemia was less than 500 parasites /μL. Conclusion: QDx Malaria Rapid test was found to have enormous advantages over smear examination due to its high degree of sensitivity, specificity, speed and ease of performance.
机译:目的:显微镜下检测寄生虫已成为数十年来疟疾诊断的参考标准。然而,难以维持所需的技术技能和基础设施已经刺激了基于对疟原虫抗原的检测的非微观疟疾快速诊断设备的开发。我们通过将QDx MALARIA PAN / Pf快速免疫层析卡测试与常规标准血液涂片法进行疟疾检测进行了比较,从而对其进行了评估。材料与方法:通过QDx疟疾快速检测和血液涂片法对总共325例发烧患者的血液样本(恶性疟疾88,间日疟疾168,恶性疟原虫和间日疟疾44,对照25)进行了调查。结果:QDx疟疾快速检测显示出96.6%的敏感性,100%的特异性和96.9%的准确性。但是,当寄生虫血症低于500寄生虫/μL时,这些参数会降低。结论:QDx疟疾快速检测技术具有高度的敏感性,特异性,速度和操作简便性,因此与涂片检查相比具有巨大优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号