...
首页> 外文期刊>Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention >Performance of the R-way Colposcopic Evaluation System in Cervical Cancer Screening
【24h】

Performance of the R-way Colposcopic Evaluation System in Cervical Cancer Screening

机译:R-way阴道镜评估系统在宫颈癌筛查中的性能

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: To investigate the diagnostic value of the R-way colposcopic evaluation system (R-way system)in cervical cancer screening. Materials and Methods: Between August 2013 and August 2014, a total of 1,059cases referred to colposcopy in Peking University First Hospital were studied using both the R-way system andconventional colposcopy. Our study evaluated and compared the diagnostic ability of the two methods in detectinghigh-grade lesions and cervical cancer (hereinafter called CIN2+). Evaluation indicators including sensitivity,specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), Youden index and the area underthe curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) were calculated. Results: The R-way systemhad a slightly lower specificity (94.5%) than conventional colposcopy (96.0%) for CIN2+ detection (P=0.181).However, the sensitivity (77.8%) was significantly higher than with the conventional colposcopic method (46.6%)(χ2=64.351, P<0.001). In addition, the AUC of the ROC for CIN2+ detection using the R-way system (0.839) waslarger than that with conventional colposcopy (0.731) (Z=4.348, P<0.001). If preliminary result had been drawnfrom cervical exfoliated cytology before colposcopy referral, combination of the R-way system with cytology couldincrease the sensitivity to 93.9% for CIN2+ detection (excluding ASCUSLSIL), confirmed by multipoint biopsyor ECC. Conclusions: The diagnostic value of the R-way evaluation system is higher than that of conventionalcolposcopic evaluation in cervical cancer screening. Moreover, taking the ease of use and standardized qualitycontrol management into account, the R-way system is highly preferable.
机译:目的:探讨R-way阴道镜评估系统(R-way system)在宫颈癌筛查中的诊断价值。资料与方法:2013年8月至2014年8月,采用R-way系统和常规阴道镜对北京大学第一医院阴道镜检查病例共1,059例进行了研究。我们的研究评估和比较了两种方法在检测高级别病变和宫颈癌(以下称为CIN2 +)中的诊断能力。计算了包括敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值(PPV),阴性预测值(NPV),Youden指数和受体工作特征(ROC)的曲线下面积(AUC)在内的评估指标。结果:R-way系统对CIN2 +检测的特异性(96.5%)略低于常规阴道镜检查(96.0%)(P = 0.181),但灵敏度(77.8%)显着高于常规阴道镜检查方法(46.6) %)(χ2 = 64.351,P <0.001)。另外,使用R-way系统的ROC用于CIN2 +检测的AUC(0.839)比传统的阴道镜检查(0.731)大(Z = 4.348,P <0.001)。如果在阴道镜转诊之前从宫颈脱落细胞学中得出初步结果,则通过多点活组织检查法ECC证实,R途系统与细胞学的结合可以将CIN2 +检测(不包括ASCUSLSIL)的敏感性提高到93.9%。结论:R-way评估系统在宫颈癌筛查中的诊断价值高于常规阴道镜评估。此外,考虑到易用性和标准化的质量控制管理,R-way系统是高度可取的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号