首页> 外文期刊>Asian Nursing Research >Case-control Study on Risk Factors of Unplanned Extubation Based on?Patient Safety Model in Critically Ill Patients with Mechanical Ventilation
【24h】

Case-control Study on Risk Factors of Unplanned Extubation Based on?Patient Safety Model in Critically Ill Patients with Mechanical Ventilation

机译:基于患者安全性模型的重症机械通气患者计划外拔管危险因素的病例对照研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Summary Purpose This study aimed to identify risk factors of unplanned extubation in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with mechanical ventilation using a patient safety model. Methods This study was designed to be a case-control study. Data collection sheets, including 29 risk factors of unplanned extubation in mechanically ventilation patients were retrospectively collected based on a patient safety model over 3 years. From 41,207 mechanically ventilated patients, 230 patients were identified to have unplanned extubation during their ICU stay. Based on the characteristics of the cohort of 230 patients who had unplanned extubation, 460 case control comparison groups with planned extubation were selected by matching age, gender and diagnosis. Results Risk factors of unplanned extubation were categorized as people, technologies, tasks, environmental factors and organizational factors, by five components of the patient safety model. The results showed the risk factors of unplanned extubation as admission route [odds ratio (OR)?=?1.8], Glasgow Coma Scale–motor (OR?=?1.3), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score (OR?=?1.06), agitation (OR?=?9.0), delirium (OR?=?11.6), mode of mechanical ventilation (OR?=?3.0–4.1) and night shifts (OR?=?6.0). The significant differences were found between the unplanned and the planned extubation groups on the number of reintubation (4.3% vs. 79.6%, p ??.001), ICU outcome at the time of discharge (χ 2 ?=?50.7, p ??.001), and length of stay in the ICU (27.0?±?33.0 vs. 43.8?±?43.5) after unplanned extubation. Conclusion ICU nurses should be able to recognize the risk factors of unplanned extubation related with the components of the safety model so as to improve patient safety by minimizing the risk for unplanned extubation.
机译:摘要目的本研究旨在使用患者安全模型确定机械通气的重症监护病房(ICU)患者计划外拔管的危险因素。方法本研究被设计为病例对照研究。根据三年以上的患者安全模型,回顾性收集了数据收集表,包括机械通气患者计划外拔管的29个危险因素。在41,207名机械通气患者中,有230名患者在入住ICU期间被确定有计划外拔管。根据230名计划外拔管患者的队列特征,通过匹配年龄,性别和诊断来选择460名计划拔管的对照组。结果计划外拔管的危险因素按患者安全模型的五个组成部分分为人员,技术,任务,环境因素和组织因素。结果显示计划外拔管的危险因素为入院途径[比值比(OR)=?1.8],格拉斯哥昏迷量表-运动(OR?=?1.3),急性生理学和慢性健康评估评分(OR?=?1.06) ),躁动(OR == 9.0),del妄(OR == 11.6),机械通气模式(OR == 3.0-4.1)和夜班(OR == 6.0)。在计划外拔管组和计划拔管组之间,拔管时ICU结局的重新插管次数(4.3%vs. 79.6%,p?<。0.001)有显着差异(χ2?=?50.7,p ≤<.001),以及计划外拔管后在ICU的住院时间(27.0±±33.0 vs.43.8±±43.5)。结论ICU护士应能够识别与安全模型组成部分相关的计划外拔管的危险因素,从而通过最大程度地减少计划外拔管的风险来提高患者安全性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号