首页> 外文期刊>Arab Journal of Urology >[1] Ejaculation-preserving transurethral bipolar prostatectomy: Enucleation vs resection
【24h】

[1] Ejaculation-preserving transurethral bipolar prostatectomy: Enucleation vs resection

机译:[1]保留射精的经尿道双极前列腺切除术:去核与切除

获取原文
           

摘要

ObjectiveTo assess the feasibility and safety of a novel ejaculation-preserving transurethral bipolar resection of prostate (ep-TUBRP) and compare the resection technique to the enucleation technique.MethodsAfter obtaining local ethics approval, 100 consecutive patients with benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) and normal sexual activity were enrolled from June 2015 to June 2016. These patients were selectively randomised into two groups; 50 patients in each group. Group 1 underwent ejaculation-preserving transurethral bipolar enucleation of prostate (ep-TUBEP) and Group 2 underwent ep-TUBRP. All patients were evaluated pre- and postoperatively using the maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax); post-void residual urine volume (PVR); International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS); and the five-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5), including two additional questions evaluating ejaculation and orgasm. All patients were followed-up at 1, 3, and 6?months.ResultsOverall, 100, 98 and 97 patients were evaluated at 1, 3 and 6?months, respectively. All preoperative parameters such as age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate volume, Qmax, PVR, IPSS, and IIEF-5 were comparable between the two groups (allP>0.05). At the 1-month follow-up, antegrade ejaculation was preserved in 88 of 100 (88%) (45 patients in Group 1 and 43 in Group 2). In addition, there were significant improvements in Qmax[from a mean (SD) of 6.54 (1.72)?mL/s to 15.38 (3.02) mL/s], PVR [from a mean (SD) of 94.4 (41.85)?mL to 25.04 (32.72)?mL], and IPSS [from a mean (SD) of 21.7 (6.6) to 11.72 (2.39)] compared with the preoperative measurements. Moreover, these improvements were maintained at the 3- and 6-month follow-up visits (allP<0.001). No serious adverse events were reported.ConclusionEjaculation-preserving transurethral bipolar prostatectomy seems safe and effective for preservation of antegrade ejaculation with either the resection or the enucleation technique.
机译:目的评估一种新型的保留前列腺射精的经尿道双极电切术(ep-TUBRP)的可行性和安全性,并将该技术与摘除术进行比较。从2015年6月至2016年6月进行性活动研究。每组50例。第1组进行了保留射精的经尿道前列腺双极摘除术(ep-TUBEP),第2组进行了ep-TUBRP。所有患者在术前和术后均采用最大尿流率(Qmax)进行评估。无效后残留尿量(PVR);国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS);以及国际勃起功能指数(IIEF-5)的五项版本,其中包括两个评估射精和性高潮的附加问题。所有患者均在1、3和6个月进行随访。结果分别在1、3和6个月对100、98和97例患者进行了评估。两组患者的所有术前参数,例如年龄,前列腺特异性抗原(PSA),前列腺体积,Qmax,PVR,IPSS和IIEF-5均具有可比性(allP> 0.05)。在1个月的随访中,100例中有88例(88%)保留了顺射射精(第1组45例,第2组43例)。此外,Qmax [从6.54(1.72)?mL / s的平均(SD)到15.38(3.02)mL / s]的Pmax [从94.4(41.85)?mL的平均(SD)显着改善。 25.04(32.72)?mL]和IPSS [从平均21.7(6.6)到11.72(2.39)]与术前测量值比较。此外,这些改善在3个月和6个月的随访中得以维持(allP <0.001)。没有严重不良事件的报道。结论保留射精的经尿道双极前列腺切除术通过切除术或摘除术技术保留顺行射精似乎是安全有效的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号