首页> 外文期刊>Argument & computation >Discourse relations: Genre-specific degrees of overtness in argumentative and narrative discourse
【24h】

Discourse relations: Genre-specific degrees of overtness in argumentative and narrative discourse

机译:话语关系:议论性和叙事性话语中特定体裁的公开程度

获取原文
       

摘要

Based on a contrastive approach that compares the argumentative genre of editorial with the narrative genre of personal narrative across two production modes, single-authored data and data elicited in an editing-based task, this paper examines the impact of genre on the realizations of discourse relations, paying particular attention to the argumentative genre and its preferential realizations of Contrast, Continuation, Elaboration and Explanation/Result. Discourse relations are conceived of as sociocognitive constructs that are encoded in coherence strands and may additionally be signalled overtly with discourse connectives, metacomments and/or pragmatic word order. Quantitative analyses of single-authored and co-constructed data reveal systematic differences in the variation of degrees of overtness between editorials and personal narratives. In the argumentative genre, Explanation, Continuation and Comment tend to be realized with a lower degree of overtness, Elaboration with a higher degree of overtness. Contrast is realized overtly throughout the data, irrespective of genre.
机译:基于一种对比方法,该方法将社论的论证体裁与个人叙事的叙事体裁跨两种生产模式,单作者数据和在基于编辑的任务中引出的数据进行比较,本文研究了体裁对语篇实现的影响关系,特别注意论证体裁及其对对比,延续,阐述和解释/结果的优先实现。话语关系被认为是社会认知结构,被编码为连贯的链条,并可能另外带有话语连接词,元注释和/或实用语序来表示。单一作者和共同构建的数据的定量分析显示,社论和个人叙述之间公开程度的系统性差异。在争论的类型中,解释,延续和评论倾向于以较低的公开程度来实现,而详尽的表达则以较高的公开程度来实现。不论类型如何,在整个数据中都会明显地形成对比。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号