...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition >Parental presence on neonatal intensive care unit clinical bedside rounds: randomised trial and focus group discussion
【24h】

Parental presence on neonatal intensive care unit clinical bedside rounds: randomised trial and focus group discussion

机译:新生儿重症监护病房临床床旁检查的父母身分:随机试验和焦点小组讨论

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background There are limited data to inform the choice between parental presence at clinical bedside rounds (PPCBR) and non-PPCBR in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Methods We performed a single-centre, survey-based, crossed-over randomised trial involving parents of all infants who were admitted to NICU and anticipated to stay 11?days. Parents were randomly assigned using a computer-generated stratified block randomisation protocol to start with PPCBR or non-PPCBR and then crossed over to the other arm after a wash-out period. At the conclusion of each arm, parents completed the ‘NICU Parental Stressor Scale’ (a validated tool) and a satisfaction survey. After completion of the trial, we surveyed all healthcare providers who participated at least in one PPCBR rounding episode. We also offered all participating parents and healthcare providers the opportunity to partake in a focus group discussion regarding PPCBR. Results A total of 72 parents were enrolled in this study, with 63 parents (87%) partially or fully completing the trial. Of the parents who completed the trial, 95% agreed that parents should be allowed to attend clinical bedside rounds. A total of 39 healthcare providers’ surveys were returned and 35 (90%) agreed that parents should be allowed to attend rounds. Nine healthcare providers and 8 parents participated in an interview or focus group, augmenting our understanding of the ways in which PPCBR was beneficial. Conclusions Parents and healthcare providers strongly support PPCBR. NICUs should develop policies allowing PPCBR while mitigating the downsides and concerns of parents and healthcare providers such as decreased education opportunity and confidentiality concerns.
机译:背景技术数据有限,无法告知新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)在临床床旁检查(PPCBR)和非PPCBR时父母是否在场。方法我们进行了一项基于调查的单中心,交叉交叉随机试验,纳入了所有入院并预计住院时间超过11天的婴儿的父母。使用计算机生成的分层区组随机化方案将父母随机分配为从PPCBR或非PPCBR开始,然后在清洗期后越过另一臂。在每一组的结论中,父母都完成了“ NICU父母压力源量表”(一种经过验证的工具)和满意度调查。试验完成后,我们对至少参加了一次PPCBR四舍五入的所有医疗保健提供者进行了调查。我们还为所有参与的父母和医疗保健提供者提供了参与有关PPCBR的焦点小组讨论的机会。结果共有72位父母参加了这项研究,其中63位父母(占87%)部分或全部完成了该试验。完成试验的父母中,有95%同意应允许父母参加临床床旁检查。总共返回了39个医疗服务提供者的调查,其中35个(90%)同意应该允许父母参加巡回检查。 9名医疗保健提供者和8名父母参加了访谈或焦点小组会议,加深了我们对PPCBR受益方式的理解。结论父母和医疗保健提供者大力支持PPCBR。重症监护病房应制定政策,允许PPCBR,同时减轻父母和医疗保健提供者的负面影响和担忧,例如减少的受教育机会和保密问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号