...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition >Perinatal outcomes for extremely preterm babies in relation to place of birth in England: the EPICure 2 study
【24h】

Perinatal outcomes for extremely preterm babies in relation to place of birth in England: the EPICure 2 study

机译:EPICure 2研究显示,与英国出生地相关的极端早产儿的围产期结局

获取原文

摘要

Background Expertise and resources may be important determinants of outcome for extremely preterm babies. We evaluated the effect of place of birth and perinatal transfer on survival and neonatal morbidity within a prospective cohort of births between 22 and 26?weeks of gestation in England during 2006. Methods We studied the whole population of 2460 births where the fetus was alive at the admission of the mother to hospital for delivery. Outcomes to discharge were compared between level 3 (most intensive) and level 2 maternity services, with and without transfers, and by activity level of level 3 neonatal unit; ORs were adjusted for gestation at birth and birthweight for gestation (adjusted ORs (aOR)). Findings Of this national birth cohort, 56% were born in maternity services with level 3 and 34% with level 2 neonatal units; 10% were born in a setting without ongoing intensive care facilities (level 1). When compared with level 2 settings, risk of death in level 3 services was reduced (aOR 0.73 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.90)), but the proportion surviving without neonatal morbidity was similar (aOR 1.27 (0.93 to 1.74)). Analysis by intended hospital of birth confirmed reduced mortality in level 3 services. Following antenatal transfer into a level 3 setting, there were fewer intrapartum or labour ward deaths, and overall mortality was higher for those remaining in level 2 services (aOR 1.44 (1.09 to 1.90)). Among level 3 services, those with higher activity had fewer deaths overall (aOR 0.68 (0.52 to 0.89)). Interpretation Despite national policy, only 56% of births between 22 and 26?weeks of gestation occurred in maternity services with a level 3 neonatal facility. Survival was significantly enhanced following birth in level 3 services, particularly those with high activity; this was not at the cost of increased neonatal morbidity.
机译:背景技术和资源可能是极早产婴儿结局的重要决定因素。我们评估了2006年英格兰未来22至26周的预期出生队列中出生地点和围产期转移对存活率和新生儿发病率的影响。方法我们研究了2460例胎儿存活的总人口。母亲入院分娩。比较了有无转移的3级(最密集)和2级产妇服务的出院结果,并按3级新生儿单位的活动水平进行了比较;调整了出生时的妊娠OR,并调整了出生时的体重(调整的OR(aOR))。在全国出生队列中,有56%的婴儿出生在3级的产妇服务部门中,有34%的婴儿出生在2级的新生儿部门。 10%的人出生在没有重症监护设施的环境中(1级)。与第2级设置相比,第3级服务中的死亡风险降低了(aOR 0.73(95%CI 0.59至0.90)),但是没有新生儿发病率的存活率相似(aOR 1.27(0.93至1.74))。预期分娩医院的分析证实了三级服务死亡率的降低。产前转移至3级环境后,产妇或劳动病房死亡人数减少,而2级服务中其余人员的总死亡率更高(aOR 1.44(1.09至1.90))。在3级服务中,活动量较高的服务总体上具有较少的死亡(aOR 0.68(0.52至0.89))。解释尽管有国家政策,但只有22%的妊娠在22至26周之间出生在具有3级新生儿设施的孕产服务中。出生后在三级服务中,尤其是那些活动量大的人,生存率显着提高;这并不以增加新生儿发病率为代价。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号