首页> 外文期刊>Archives of disease in childhood >Comparing childhood leukaemia treatment before and after the introduction of a parental education programme in Indonesia
【24h】

Comparing childhood leukaemia treatment before and after the introduction of a parental education programme in Indonesia

机译:在印度尼西亚推行家长教育计划前后比较儿童白血病的治疗方法

获取原文
           

摘要

Setting: Previously, treatment and the results of treatment for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) in Indonesia differed significantly between poor and prosperous patients. Poor patients received less individual attention from oncologists and access to parental education and donated chemotherapy was lacking. Intervention: A structured parental education programme for both poor and prosperous parents was introduced in January 2004 to improve access to parental education and donated chemotherapy. The programme consisted of a video presentation, an information booklet, DVD, audiocassette, a statement-of-understanding for donated chemotherapy, and a complaints procedure. Informed consent was also sought. Objective: Our study compared childhood ALL treatment outcome before and after the introduction of the parental education programme. Design: The medical records of 283 children with ALL diagnosed before (1997–2002; n?=?164) and after (2004–2006; n?=?119) the introduction of the education programme were reviewed. Data on treatment results and parental socioeconomic status were collected. Results: After the introduction of the education programme, treatment refusal decreased (from 14% to 2%) and event-free survival increased (from 13% to 29%) significantly among poor patients. Treatment dropout increased (from 0% to 13%) significantly among prosperous patients. Overall, toxic death (from 23% to 36%) increased significantly, but there was no significant difference in event-free survival. Conclusions: After introduction of the programme, treatment refusal decreased and event-free survival increased significantly among poor families. However, improved knowledge, skills and communication are still required to combat the high rates of toxic death and treatment dropout. Treatment intensity should be accompanied by improved supportive care.
机译:背景:以前,印度尼西亚的儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)的治疗方法和治疗结果在贫穷和富裕患者之间有显着差异。贫困患者受到肿瘤科医生的关注较少,缺乏接受父母教育的机会,而且缺乏捐赠的化学疗法。干预措施:2004年1月开始实施针对贫困和富裕父母的结构化父母教育计划,以改善获得父母教育和捐赠化学疗法的机会。该计划包括视频演示,信息手册,DVD,录音带,捐赠化学疗法的理解声明以及投诉程序。还寻求知情同意。目的:我们的研究比较了引入父母教育计划前后儿童期ALL治疗的效果。设计:回顾了在引入教育计划之前(1997-2002年; n?=?164)和之后(2004-2006年; n?=?119)确诊的283例ALL儿童的病历。收集有关治疗结果和父母社会经济状况的数据。结果:引入教育计划后,贫困患者的拒绝治疗率从14%降低到2%,无事件生存率从13%显着提高到29%。繁荣患者的治疗辍学率显着增加(从0%增至13%)。总体而言,毒性死亡(从23%增至36%)显着增加,但无事件生存率无显着差异。结论:实施该计划后,贫困家庭的拒绝治疗率降低,无事件生存率显着提高。但是,仍然需要提高知识,技能和沟通能力,以应对高毒性死亡和治疗辍学的高比率。治疗强度应伴有改善的支持治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号