...
首页> 外文期刊>Annual Research & Review in Biology >Current Clinical Status of Homeopathy; An Evidence Based Retrospective Six Years Review
【24h】

Current Clinical Status of Homeopathy; An Evidence Based Retrospective Six Years Review

机译:顺势疗法的当前临床状况;循证回顾六年回顾

获取原文

摘要

Background: Homeopathy, as an alternative treatment system for the treatment of various diseases, is widely used in various regions of the world. However the clinical benefits of homeopathy remains controversial. Aim of the Study: This review highlights the most up-to-date and current clinical trials and research carried out in the field of homeopathy and to compare its effectiveness in combating various diseases. Methodology: A retrospective literature search was performed from 2012 to 2017. All the articles, containing clinical trials in human subjects, were searched in different databases such as google scholar, science direct, web of science, Scopus, Springer Link and Sci Finder etc. using the keywords i.e. clinical trials in homeopathy, current clinical status of homeopathy, homeopathy and treatment of diseases, clinical cases in homeopathy and clinical studies in homeopathy. Results: Twenty one articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. The results of these clinical studies showed an effective outcome for homeopathy treatment in various diseases such as atopic dermatitis, eczema, respiratory tract infections, asthma, hay fever and pulmonary tuberculosis etc. However, for some of the diseases such as depression, mental fatigue, cancer, HIV, anxiety, dementia, induction of labor, osteoarthritis, migraine and insomnia etc. no proper clinical evidence for a safe and effective use of homeopathy exists. Furthermore, the research quality of most the homeopathy clinical trials are objectionable and negatively analyzed by various authors in terms of sample size, reproducibility and replication of data as well as lack of proper guidelines for performing homeopathy research. Conclusion: To build credibility in health care system and attract more patients as well as professional practitioners towards this system of alternative treatment, more focus in terms of quality research and practically applicable clinical trials i.e. efficacy trials (near to optimal laboratory conditions) is needed.
机译:背景:顺势疗法,作为治疗各种疾病的替代治疗系统,已在世界各地广泛使用。然而,顺势疗法的临床益处仍存在争议。研究目的:这篇综述重点介绍了顺势疗法领域的最新和最新临床试验和研究,并比较了其在抵抗各种疾病方面的有效性。方法:回顾性文献检索自2012年至2017年进行。所有文章,包括人类受试者的临床试验,均在不同数据库中进行检索,例如Google Scholar,Science Direct,Science Web,Scopus,Springer Link和Sci Finder等。使用关键字,即顺势疗法的临床试验,顺势疗法的当前临床状况,顺势疗法和疾病的治疗,顺势疗法的临床案例以及顺势疗法的临床研究。结果:21条符合纳入标准的文章被纳入本评价。这些临床研究的结果表明,在异位性皮炎,湿疹,呼吸道感染,哮喘,花粉症和肺结核等各种疾病中进行顺势疗法治疗均有效。但是,对于抑郁症,精神疲劳,癌症,HIV,焦虑症,痴呆症,引产,骨关节炎,偏头痛和失眠等。尚无安全有效使用顺势疗法的适当临床证据。此外,大多数同种疗法临床试验的研究质量令人反感,并且在样本量,数据的可复制性和复制性以及缺乏进行同种疗法研究的适当指导方面,各作者对此进行了负面分析。结论:为了在医疗保健系统中树立信誉并吸引更多患者和专业从业者使用这种替代治疗系统,需要在质量研究和实际适用的临床试验(即功效试验(接近最佳实验室条件))方面给予更多关注。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号