首页> 外文期刊>Ancient Science of Life >Botanical identity of plant sources of Da?amūla drugs through an analysis of published literature
【24h】

Botanical identity of plant sources of Da?amūla drugs through an analysis of published literature

机译:通过对已发表文献的分析,对达摩拉毒品的植物来源进行植物学鉴定

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Da?amūla (DM) is a top-traded group of medicinal plants used by the Ayurvedic industry. Through literature survey and analysis, this article has enlisted the botanical sources of DM, as correlated by several scholars. Such a list is not available from any single, earlier publication. It brings to light the confusion that exists in terms of botanical sources correlated to Ayurvedic entities. There is quite a bit of difference in the botanical correlation, parts, and substitutes reported in the different scholarly works, particularly for P???ipar?ī, and Agnimantha. For e.g., is Uraria picta the original intended P???ipar?ī, as the Ayurvedic Formulary of India (AFI) stipulates or is it U. lagopoidiodes or Desmodium gangeticum as other scholars report? While AFI provides two botanical correlations to Agnimantha in its two editions, namely Premna integrifolia and Clerodendrum phlomidis, other scholars correlate it to other Premna and Clerodendrum species. Why has AFI provided stem bark and whole plant as substitutes for roots of DM? Are substitutes recommended by AFI only for ecological or practical convenience or is there an Ayurvedic or pharmacological explanation for the same? Aim: There are many species used in the name of Da?amūla,, in this article all the species are listed out to find the differences in the usage of the drugs. Materials and Methods: Ayurveda texts and lexicons along with the texts which have done correlation work were considered to arrive at a list of various species used as Dasmula. Results and Conclusion: Since neither the methodology nor the logic behind the correlation have been discussed in these scholarly works, including the AFI, the same is not available for analysis or scrutiny. Such a list as provided in this article can form an essential base for a much needed systematic approach at etymological analysis, botanical correlation, and further scientific work to establish legitimacy of substitutes prescribed.
机译:背景:Da?amūla(DM)是印度草药行业使用的顶级药用植物。通过文献调查和分析,本文列举了DM的植物来源,并与多位学者进行了关联。从任何单个较早的出版物中都无法获得这样的列表。它揭示了与阿育吠陀实体相关的植物来源方面存在的困惑。在不同的学术著作中报道的植物相关性,组成和替代物存在相当大的差异,尤其是对P ??? ipar?ī和Agnimantha而言。例如,印度草阿育吠陀处方(AFI)规定,Uraria picta是最初预定的P ??? ipar?ī,还是其他学者报道的是U. lagopoidiodes或gangsum gangeticum?尽管AFI在两个版本中都对Agnimantha提供了两种植物学相关性,即整形早熟禾和Clerodendrum phlomidis,但其他学者却将其与其他Premna和Clerodendrum物种相关联。为什么AFI提供茎皮和整个植物作为DM根的替代品? AFI是否推荐替代品仅出于生态或实践上的便利,或者是否具有阿育吠陀或药理学解释?目的:以达马拉(Da?amūla)的名义使用过许多物种,在本文中列出了所有物种,以找出药物使用上的差异。材料和方法:阿育吠陀教科书和词典以及已做过相关工作的教科书被认为是达斯穆拉人使用的各种物种的清单。结果与结论:由于包括AFI在内的这些学术著作都未讨论相关方法和逻辑,因此无法进行分析或审查。本文提供的清单可以为在词源分析,植物学相关性以及进一步科学工作以建立指定替代品的合法性方面急需的系统方法提供必要的基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号