...
首页> 外文期刊>Anesthesiology research and practice >Anesthesia with Propofol versus Sevoflurane: Does the Longer Neuromuscular Block under Sevoflurane Anesthesia Reduce Laryngeal Injuries?
【24h】

Anesthesia with Propofol versus Sevoflurane: Does the Longer Neuromuscular Block under Sevoflurane Anesthesia Reduce Laryngeal Injuries?

机译:异丙酚与七氟醚的麻醉:七氟醚麻醉下更长的神经肌肉阻滞是否可以减轻喉咙损伤?

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Anesthesia can be maintained with propofol or sevoflurane. Volatile anesthetics increase neuromuscular block of muscle relaxants. We tested the hypothesis, that sevoflurane would cause less vocal cord injuries than an intravenous anesthesia with propofol. In this prospective trial, 65 patients were randomized in 2 groups: SEVO group, anesthesia with sevoflurane, and TIVA group, total intravenous anesthesia with propofol. Intubating and extubating conditions were evaluated. Vocal cord injuries were examined by stroboscopy before and 24 and 72 h after surgery; hoarseness and sore throat were assessed up to 72 h after surgery. Hoarseness and sore throat were comparable between both groups (not significant). Similar findings were observed for vocal cord injuries: 9 (SEVO) versus 5 (TIVA) patients;P=0.36; the overall incidence was 24%. Type of vocal cord injuries: 9 erythema and 5 edema of the vocal folds. Neuromuscular block was significantly longer in the SEVO group compared with the TIVA group: 71 (range: 38–148) min versus 52 (range: 21–74) min;P<0.001. Five patients (TIVA group) versus 11 patients (SEVO group) needed neostigmine to achieve a TOF ratio of 1.0(P=0.14). Under anesthesia with propofol laryngeal injuries were not increased; the risk for residual curarization, however, was lower compared with sevoflurane.
机译:可以使用异丙酚或七氟醚维持麻醉。挥发性麻醉药会增加肌肉松弛剂的神经肌肉阻滞作用。我们检验了这一假设,即七氟醚比异丙酚静脉麻醉对声带的伤害要小。在这项前瞻性试验中,将65例患者随机分为2组:SEVO组,七氟醚麻醉和TIVA组,异丙酚全静脉麻醉。评价插管和拔管条件。术前,术后24、72 h通过频闪检查声带损伤。在手术后72小时内评估声音嘶哑和喉咙痛。两组之间的声音嘶哑和喉咙痛相当(不明显)。声带损伤观察到相似的结果:9例(SEVO)对5例(TIVA); P = 0.36;总发生率为24%。声带损伤的类型:9个红斑和5个声带水肿。与TIVA组相比,SEVO组的神经肌肉阻滞时间更长:71分钟(范围:38–148)分钟,而52分钟(范围:21–74)分钟; P <0.001。 5名患者(TIVA组)和11名患者(SEVO组)需要新斯的明以达到1.0的TOF比(P = 0.14)。麻醉下丙泊酚对喉损伤没有增加;然而,与七氟醚相比,残留整理的风险较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号