...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery >Three-dimensional locking plate and conventional miniplates in the treatment of mandibular anterior fractures
【24h】

Three-dimensional locking plate and conventional miniplates in the treatment of mandibular anterior fractures

机译:三维锁定板和常规微型钢板治疗下颌前部骨折

获取原文
           

摘要

Context: Three-dimensional (3D) locking plates has been designed with the hypothesis that this will overcome the disadvantages of both the systems and also advantages of both systems will be combined for the management of mandibular fractures. Aims: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of 2-mm 3D locking miniplate in the management of anterior mandibular fracture and to compare it with Champy's miniplate. Settings and Design: A prospective, randomized, clinical trial was carried out in thirty patients who were divided equally in two groups. Subjects and Methods: Group I and Group II patients were treated with 2-mm 3D locking plates and 2-mm standard miniplates, respectively. They were evaluated according to the outcomes of the study, that is, working time, wound dehiscence, infection, segmental mobility, postoperative occlusion, need for postoperative intermaxillary fixation (IMF), and radiological evaluation of reduction and fixation. Statistical Analysis Used: Student's t-test and Mann–Whitney test were used to compare the two systems. The data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Science version 14.0. The P value was taken as significant when Results: The mean duration of procedure for Group I was found to be 49.33 min, whereas for Group II was 59.67 min. There was significantly greater pain on day 1 and at 1 week in Group II patients. 6.7% (n = 1) of both groups showed incidence of infection. Postoperative stability was adequate in most cases except in one patient (n = 1) of 3D locking system, which was revealed as postoperative occlusal disharmony, unsatisfactory radiological reduction of the fracture fragments, and the segmental mobility. There was no incidence of wound dehiscence, tooth damage, and nerve damage in either group. Conclusions: The result of the study can conclude that there is no major difference between both systems in terms of treatment outcome.
机译:背景:三维(3D)锁定板的设计假设是,这将克服两个系统的缺点,并且将两个系统的优点结合起来用于处理下颌骨骨折。目的:本研究的目的是评估2 mm 3D锁定微型钢板在下颌前骨折治疗中的疗效,并将其与Champy微型钢板进行比较。设置和设计:对30名患者进行了一项前瞻性随机临床试验,将其平均分为两组。受试者和方法:第一组和第二组患者分别接受2毫米3D锁定板和2毫米标准微型板治疗。根据研究结果对他们进行了评估,即工作时间,伤口裂开,感染,节段活动性,术后闭塞,术后颌间固定(IMF)的需要以及复位和固定的放射学评估。使用的统计分析:使用学生的t检验和曼恩·惠特尼检验比较这两个系统。使用统计软件包(社会科学版本14.0)分析数据。当结果:发现第一组的平均手术时间为49.33分钟,而第二组的平均手术时间为59.67分钟时,P值视为显着。 II组患者在第1天和第1周疼痛明显增加。两组中有6.7%(n = 1)显示感染发生率。除一名患者(n = 1)的3D锁定系统外,在大多数情况下,术后稳定性都足够,这表现为术后咬合不协调,骨折碎片的放射学减少不令人满意以及节段活动性。两组均无伤口裂开,牙齿损伤和神经损伤的发生。结论:研究结果可以得出结论,两种系统在治疗结果方面没有重大差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号