首页> 外文期刊>Annales Geophysicae >The impact on global magnetohydrodynamic simulations from varying initialisation methods: results from GUMICS-4
【24h】

The impact on global magnetohydrodynamic simulations from varying initialisation methods: results from GUMICS-4

机译:不同的初始化方法对整体磁流体动力学模拟的影响:GUMICS-4的结果

获取原文
       

摘要

We investigate the effects of different initialisation methods of the GUMICS-4 global magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulation to the dynamics in different parts of the Earth's magnetosphere and hence compare five 12a?ˉh simulation runs that were initiated by 3a?ˉh of synthetic data and followed by 9a?ˉh of solar wind measurements using the OMNI data as input. As a reference, we use a simulation run that includes nearly 60a?ˉh of OMNI data as input prior to the 9a?ˉh interval examined with different initialisations. The selected interval is a high-speed stream event during a 10-day interval (12a??22??June??2007). The synthetic initialisations include stepwise, linear and sinusoidal functions of the interplanetary magnetic field with constant density and velocity values. The results show that the solutions converge within 1a?ˉh to give a good agreement in both the bow shock and the magnetopause position. However, the different initialisation methods lead to local differences which should be taken into consideration when comparing model results to satellite measurements.
机译:我们研究了GUMICS-4全球磁流体动力学(MHD)模拟的不同初始化方法对地球磁层不同部分动力学的影响,因此比较了由3a?h合成数据启动并随后进行的5次12a?hh模拟运行使用OMNI数据作为输入,对太阳风进行9a?h的测量。作为参考,我们使用了一个模拟运行,其中包括在使用不同初始化检查的9a?h间隔之前,将近60a?h的OMNI数据作为输入。所选时间间隔是10天时间间隔内的高速流事件(2007年6月12日至22日)。合成初始化包括具有恒定密度和速度值的行星际磁场的逐步,线性和正弦函数。结果表明,解在1a?h内收敛,在弓形冲击和磁致停弹位置上都具有良好的一致性。但是,不同的初始化方法会导致局部差异,将模型结果与卫星测量结果进行比较时应考虑这些差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号