...
首页> 外文期刊>Animal Science Papers and Reports >Factors affecting genetic correlation estimates from dairy sires’ genetic evaluations to assess genotype-environment interaction
【24h】

Factors affecting genetic correlation estimates from dairy sires’ genetic evaluations to assess genotype-environment interaction

机译:影响奶牛父辈评估基因型与环境相互作用的遗传评估中遗传相关性估计的因素

获取原文

摘要

Effects of trait heritability (0.05 or 0.25), effective daughters number (30 to 500), sires number (10 to 500), and sire selection (selecting or not the top 50% sires), were evaluated based upon standard error (SE) and bias of genetic correlations (rG) between countries estimated from Calo’s method (rG) using simulated data. Calo’s method is based on correlations between sire’s predicted transmitting abilities (PTA) in two countries adjusted for reliabilities. Unselected sire’s data analysis gave nearly unbiased rG in all cases, but selected sire’s data analysis gave underestimates. Bias was from -0.34 to -0.05 for the 0.25 heritability trait (milk yield), and from -0.42 to -0.17 for the 0.05 heritability trait (functional). Underestimation of rG decreased with increased effective number of daughters (PTA’s reliability), but was quite insensitive to number of sires. The SE of genetic correlations estimates decreased with increased PTA’s reliability and sires number, and was higher for selected sires. Approximately 50 sires with PTA’s reliabilities≥0.97 on each country are required to obtain accurate (SE≤0.02) and unbiased (bias≤0.05|) rG with Calo’s method using the best 50% selected sires. Many genetic correlation estimates between countries, already published using the Calo’s method, may be underestimates, particularly for low heritability traits, and with low number of effective daughters in the importing country. Therefore, caution is required before interpreting the published rG<1 as evidence for genotype-environment interaction.
机译:基于标准误差(SE)评估了性状遗传力(0.05或0.25),有效子代数(30至500),父系数(10至500)和父系选择(选择前50%的父系)的影响。和Calo方法(rG)使用模拟数据估算的国家之间的遗传相关性(rG)偏差。 Calo的方法基于两个国家的父亲的预测传播能力(PTA)之间的相关性,并针对可靠性进行了调整。在所有情况下,未选出父亲的数据分析几乎都能使rG保持公正,但选出父亲的数据分析却低估了他们的收入。 0.25遗传性状(产奶量)的偏差为-0.34至-0.05,0.05遗传性状(功能性)的偏差为-0.42至-0.17。 rG的低估随着有效子代数的增加而减少(PTA的可靠性),但对父系数不敏感。遗传相关性的SE估计值随着PTA可靠性和父本数量的增加而降低,而选定父本更高。在每个国家/地区,大约需要50个PTA可靠性≥0.97的父本,才能使用Calo方法(使用精选的50%最佳父本)获得准确的(SE≤0.02)和无偏的(bias≤0.05|)rG。已经使用Calo方法发表的国家之间的许多遗传相关性估计值可能被低估了,特别是对于遗传力低的特征,以及在进口国中有效女儿数量较少的情况。因此,在解释发表的rG <1作为基因型-环境相互作用的证据之前,需要谨慎行事。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号