首页> 外文期刊>Ampersand >Reflection of stance through it bundles in applied linguistics
【24h】

Reflection of stance through it bundles in applied linguistics

机译:通过应用语言学中的 it 包反映立场

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The study of linguistic devices serving as stance expressions is one of the best means by which the relationship between the writer, the reader and the propositional meaning could be examined. This paper looks at a particular structural group of lexical bundles encoding stance expressions. These are clausal bundles starting with an anticipatory it in which subject comes at the end of the clause (e.g. it is important to , it should be noted that ). The use of these bundles is compared in three corpora of research articles, doctoral dissertations and master theses, all in the discipline of applied linguistics, to explore the possible generic variations and address the potential differences between published and students writing too. Drawing on Hewings and Hewings' functional typology of interpersonal roles of it clauses, the study shows that the use of this structural group of bundles in research articles was significantly more than that of the two groups of postgraduate writing. However, there were some it bundles used more heavily by one or both groups of postgraduate students. Functional analysis also revealed that these bundles encoded stance expressions of hedging, attitude marking, emphasis, attribution and epistemic meanings. The differences are explained by referring to generic expectations and students' growing disciplinary identity. There are also some implications for the academic writing. Highlights ? This paper looks at a particular structural group of lexical bundles encoding stance expressions. ? The use of it bundles is compared in three corpora of research articles, doctoral dissertations, and master theses in the discipline of applied linguistics. ? These bundles are shown to have stance expressions of hedging, marking attitude, stressing emphasis, attributing, and making epistemic meanings. ? The major difference is found to be between students' genres and research articles with the former drawing less on interpersonal meanings.
机译:作为立场表达的语言手段的研究是检验作者,读者和命题意义之间关系的最佳手段之一。本文着眼于编码姿势表达的词汇束的特定结构组。这些是从预期的开头开始的子句束,其中主题位于条款的末尾(例如,重要的是,应注意)。在应用语言学领域的三类研究文章(博士论文和硕士论文)中比较了这些捆绑软件的使用,以探讨可能的通用变化,并解决出版和学生写作之间的潜在差异。利用Hewings和Hewings的it子句在人际交往中的功能类型学,研究表明,在研究文章中使用这种捆绑式结构组的使用明显多于两组研究生写作。但是,有一些捆绑软件被一组或两组研究生使用得更多。功能分析还显示,这些捆绑软件编码了套期保值,态度标记,强调,归因和认知意义的姿态表达。通过提及一般期望和学生不断增长的学科认同来解释差异。对学术著作也有一些启示。强调 ?本文着眼于编码姿势表达的词汇束的特定结构组。 ?在三类研究文章,博士论文和应用语言学领域的硕士论文中比较了它的用法。 ?这些束被证明具有套期保值,标记态度,强调强调,归因和产生认知意义的姿态表达。 ?发现主要的区别在于学生的体裁和研究文章之间,前者在人际意义上的借鉴较少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号