首页> 外文期刊>American journal of public health >Resource-Limited, Collaborative Pilot Intervention for Chronically Homeless, Alcohol-Dependent Frequent Emergency Department Users
【24h】

Resource-Limited, Collaborative Pilot Intervention for Chronically Homeless, Alcohol-Dependent Frequent Emergency Department Users

机译:长期无家可归,依赖酒精的经常性急诊室用户的资源有限,协作性先导干预

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We introduced case management and homeless outreach to chronically homeless, alcohol-dependent, frequent emergency department (ED) visitors using existing resources. We assessed the difference in differences of ED visits 6 months pre- and postintervention using a prospective, nonequivalent control group trial. Secondary outcomes included changes in hospitalizations and housing. The differences in differences between intervention and prospective patients and retrospective controls were ?12.1 (95% CI?=??22.1, ?2.0) and ?12.8 (95% CI?=??26.1, 0.6) for ED visits and ?8.5 (95% CI?=??22.8, 5.8) and ?19.0 (95% CI?=??34.3, ?3.6) for inpatient days, respectively. Eighteen participants accepted shelter; no controls were housed. Through intervention, ED use decreased and housing was achieved. Chronically homeless and alcohol-dependent patients are overrepresented among frequent emergency department (ED) users and account for disproportionate health care visits and costs. 1–22 Interventions that address their complex psychosocial issues through case management, supportive housing, or both have reduced their use of costly public resources. 1,7,11,18,21,23–34 These models, though likely cost effective, are expensive, precluding widespread dissemination. 7,11,18,21,23,25,31 Our aim was to assess the impact of coordinated case management and facilitated access to homeless outreach services, using existing resources, on ED utilization by chronically homeless, alcohol-dependent adults with persistently frequent ED use.
机译:我们向使用现有资源的长期无家可归者,依赖酒精的频繁急诊科(ED)访客介绍了案例管理和无家可归者服务。我们使用一项前瞻性,非等效对照组试验评估了干预前后6个月ED访视差异的差异。次要结果包括住院和住房的变化。急诊就诊时,干预组和预期患者与回顾性对照之间的差异分别为?12.1(95%CI?=?22.1,?2.0)和?12.8(95%CI?=?26.1,0.6)和?8.5(住院日分别为95%CI?=?22.8,5.8)和?19.0(95%CI?=?34.3,?3.6)。十八名参与者接受了庇护;没有控制被安置。通过干预,减少了ED的使用并实现了住房。长期无家可归和酒精依赖的患者在急诊科频繁使用,并且造成过多的医疗就诊和费用。 1–22通过案件管理,支持性住房或两者同时解决其复杂的社会心理问题的干预措施,减少了对昂贵的公共资源的使用。 1,7,11,18,21,23–34这些模型虽然可能具有成本效益,但价格昂贵,无法广泛传播。 7,11,18,21,23,25,31我们的目标是评估协调病例管理并利用现有资源便利获得无家可归者外展服务的机会对长期无家可归,酗酒且长期酗酒的成年人使用ED的影响ED使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号