...
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of public health >Resistant to the Recession: Low-Income Adults’ Maintenance of Cooking and Away-From-Home Eating Behaviors During Times of Economic Turbulence
【24h】

Resistant to the Recession: Low-Income Adults’ Maintenance of Cooking and Away-From-Home Eating Behaviors During Times of Economic Turbulence

机译:抵制经济衰退:经济动荡时期,低收入成年人维持烹饪和外出就餐的行为

获取原文

摘要

Objectives. We examined the effects of state-level unemployment rates during the recession of 2008 on patterns of home food preparation and away-from-home (AFH) eating among low-income and minority populations. Methods. We analyzed pooled cross-sectional data on 118?635 adults aged 18 years or older who took part in the American Time Use Study. Multinomial logistic regression models stratified by gender were used to evaluate the associations between state-level unemployment, poverty, race/ethnicity, and time spent cooking, and log binomial regression was used to assess respondents’ AFH consumption patterns. Results. High state-level unemployment was associated with only trivial increases in respondents’ cooking patterns and virtually no change in their AFH eating patterns. Low-income and racial/ethnic minority groups were not disproportionately affected by the recession. Conclusions. Even during a major economic downturn, US adults are resistant to food-related behavior change. More work is needed to understand whether this reluctance to change is attributable to time limits, lack of knowledge or skill related to food preparation, or lack of access to fresh produce and raw ingredients. The obesity epidemic in the United States exhibits a steep social gradient according to socioeconomic status (SES) and race, 1–4 with the poor, Hispanics, and non-Hispanic Blacks bearing a disproportionate burden of overweight and obesity. 5,6 This disparity stems in part from substantial barriers to achieving a healthful diet, including food insufficiency, food deserts, and the preponderance of cheap, high-energy foods. 7–10 However, a growing body of evidence indicates that time scarcity, as opposed to money, is the most significant barrier to achieving the nutritional targets set by nutrition allotment programs such as the Thrifty Food Plan, which typically necessitate cooking from scratch to meet financial constraints. 11–14 For many resource-scarce households, the struggle to manage the competing demands of work, transportation, social services, and child care limits the time available to prepare healthy meals 15–19 and prompts the purchase of quick, convenient foods 20–23 such as away-from-home (AFH) foods or processed foods, which tend to be energy dense and nutrient poor. 9,10,24–26 In fact, the Institute of Medicine recently recognized the importance of such time limitations, calling for the US Department of Agriculture to incorporate the value of time in calculating adequate nutrition program allotments. 27 Notwithstanding the growing recognition of time as a major limitation to home food preparation, it is less clear how food preparation and consumption patterns have been influenced by recent economic downswings. The Great Recession of 2008 was characterized by an increase in the national unemployment rate from 5.0% in December 2007 to 9.5% in June 2009. 28 Historically, low-SES adults have been more likely to suffer recession-related effects, including layoffs, earnings reductions, and human capital losses, 29,30 and this was also the case during the Great Recession, with younger, less educated, and minority workers experiencing steeper increases in unemployment. 31,32 Previous economic downturns have been linked to shifts in food preparation patterns and diets. For example, during Russia’s economic collapse in 1998, low-income households increased the amount of food they prepared at home with basic ingredients as a strategy to decrease the cost per calorie of food and preserve a diet comparable to their precrisis diet. 33 In fact, recent studies have shown that, in developed countries, recessionary periods are associated with better health behaviors, including increases in physical activity, increased fruit and vegetable intake, and decreases in obesity. 34–39 These effects occur outside of individual employment status, with increases in aggregate unemployment rates changing the way people in the affected area make decisions about money and time. For example, wage rate increases are dampened during economic downturns, affecting household income and consequently food shopping and preparation. Similarly, volatility in the job market 40 decreases the opportunity cost of time, making it less costly to undertake health-promoting activities such as exercise and cooking. Persistent elevated stress associated with the increased likelihood of unemployment can also affect the amount and healthfulness of food that people buy and consume. 41,42 However, previous work on recessions and health has neglected to consider the impact of a recession on the sociodemographic groups most affected, including low-SES and minority populations. One possibility is that these groups might save money by reverting to cooking with basic ingredients, similar to the situation in Russia in 1998. Alternately, households struggling to find and maintain resources in an economically precarious environment might choose to save time and spend money by
机译:目标。我们研究了2008年经济衰退期间州一级的失业率对低收入和少数族裔人口的家庭食物准备和非家庭进餐方式的影响。方法。我们分析了参与美国时间使用研究的118-635名18岁以上成年人的汇总横截面数据。使用按性别分层的多项Logistic回归模型来评估州级失业,贫困,种族/民族和烹饪时间之间的关联,而对数二项回归则用于评估受访者的AFH消费模式。结果。州一级的高失业率仅与受访者的烹饪方式微不足道相关,而AFH饮食方式几乎没有变化。低收入和种族/族裔少数群体并未受到经济衰退的不成比例的影响。结论。即使在严重的经济衰退时期,美国成年人也抵制与食物相关的行为改变。需要做更多的工作来了解这种不愿改变的原因是由于时间限制,缺乏与食品制备相关的知识或技能,还是缺乏获取新鲜农产品和原料的机会。根据社会经济地位(SES)和种族,美国的肥胖病流行状况呈现陡峭的社会梯度,其中1-4岁的穷人,西班牙裔美国人和非西班牙裔黑人承担着超重和肥胖的不成比例负担。 5,6这种差异部分源于实现健康饮食的实质性障碍,包括食物不足,食物荒芜以及廉价,高能量的食物。 7–10然而,越来越多的证据表明,与金钱相比,时间紧缺是实现营养分配计划(例如节俭食品计划)设定的营养目标的最主要障碍,该计划通常需要从头开始烹饪才能满足财务限制。 11–14对于许多资源匮乏的家庭来说,为应对工作,交通,社会服务和儿童保育的竞争需求而进行的努力限制了准备健康饭菜的可用时间15-19,并促使人们购买速食食品20- 23,例如出门在外(AFH)的食品或加工食品,它们往往能量密集且营养缺乏。 9,10,24–26实际上,医学研究所最近意识到了这种时间限制的重要性,呼吁美国农业部在计算足够的营养计划分配时纳入时间价值。 27尽管人们越来越认识到时间是家庭食物制备的主要限制,但尚不清楚最近的经济下滑如何影响食物制备和消费方式。 2008年的经济大衰退的特征是,全国失业率从2007年12月的5.0%上升到2009年6月的9.5%。28从历史上看,低社会经济地位的成年人更容易遭受与衰退相关的影响,包括裁员,收入增加。减少和人力资本损失29,30,在大萧条期间也是如此,年轻,受教育程度较低,少数族裔的失业率急剧上升。 31,32先前的经济低迷与食物制备方式和饮食的变化有关。例如,在1998年俄罗斯经济崩溃期间,低收入家庭增加了在家中准备的使用基本成分的食物数量,以此作为降低每卡路里食物成本并保持与危机前饮食相当的饮食习惯的策略。 33实际上,最近的研究表明,在发达国家,衰退期与更好的健康行为有关,包括体育活动增加,水果和蔬菜摄入量增加以及肥胖症减少。 34–39这些影响发生在个人就业状况之外,总失业率的上升改变了受灾地区人们决定金钱和时间的方式。例如,在经济不景气期间,工资率的上升受到抑制,影响了家庭收入,进而影响了食品的购买和准备。同样,就业市场40的动荡减少了时间的机会成本,使得开展诸如运动和烹饪之类的健康活动的成本降低。与失业可能性增加相关的持续高压力也可能影响人们购买和食用的食物的数量和健康性。 41,42但是,先前有关衰退和健康的工作忽略了考虑衰退对受影响最严重的社会人口群体,包括低社会经济地位和少数群体的影响。一种可能性是,这些群体可以通过恢复使用基本食材烹饪来节省金钱,这与1998年俄罗斯的情况类似。或者,在经济不稳定的环境中苦苦寻找和维护资源的家庭可能会选择节省时间和金钱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号