首页> 外文期刊>American journal of public health >Associations Between Psychiatric Inpatient Bed Supply and the Prevalence of Serious Mental Illness in Veterans Affairs Nursing Homes
【24h】

Associations Between Psychiatric Inpatient Bed Supply and the Prevalence of Serious Mental Illness in Veterans Affairs Nursing Homes

机译:退伍军人护理院的精神科住院床位供应与严重精神疾病患病率之间的关联

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives. We assessed whether reductions in inpatient psychiatric beds resulted in transinstitutionalization to nursing home care of patients with serious mental illness (SMI) within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Methods. We assessed trends in national and site-level inpatient psychiatric beds and nursing home patient demographics, service use, and functioning from the VHA National Patient Care Database, VHA Service Support Center Bed Control, and VHA Minimum Data Set. We estimated nursing home admission appropriateness using propensity score analyses based on Michigan Medicaid Nursing Facility Level of Care Determinations ratings. Results. From 1999 to 2007, the number of VHA inpatient psychiatric beds declined (43?894–40?928), the average inpatient length of stay decreased (33.1–19.0 days), and the prevalence of SMI in nursing homes rose (29.4%–43.8%). At site level, psychiatric inpatient bed availability was unrelated to SMI prevalence in nursing home admissions. However, nursing home residents with SMI were more likely to be inappropriately admitted than were residents without SMI (4.0% vs 3.2%). Conclusions. These results suggest the need for increased attention to the long-term care needs of individuals with SMI. Additional steps need to be taken to ensure that patients with SMI are offered appropriate alternatives to nursing home care and receive adequate screening before admission to nursing home treatment. Over the past half century, the locus of psychiatric care has shifted from long-term inpatient psychiatric hospitals to community-based outpatient care settings, 1 with this “deinstitutionalization” movement resulting in a sharp decline in state psychiatric hospital beds. 2 This movement is regarded as a “disaster of the past,” 3 in part because of the inadequacy of outpatient services to meet the needs of symptomatic psychiatric patients. 3,4 In the absence of adequate community-based services, deinstitutionalization in name often resulted in transinstitutionalization in practice, as symptomatic patients were shifted to other institutional settings, such as general hospitals and nursing homes. 1 Research investigating transinstitutionalization has mixed results. A 3-year follow-up of patients discharged from a state psychiatric hospital found rates of more than 20% admission to community inpatient psychiatric units, with an average of more than 75 yearly inpatient days per patient. 5 Similarly, a large-scale longitudinal evaluation of the Canadian mental health system found that reductions in inpatient psychiatric beds were associated with increased utilization of general hospital psychiatric beds, a pattern that continued for more than 2 decades until community mental health services expanded to meet the needs of psychiatric patients. 6 However, another evaluation of discharged state psychiatric patients found decreased rates of postdischarge jail and general hospital psychiatric unit utilization relative to the use of these services during the time that patients received state psychiatric care. 7 There has been limited investigation into transinstitutionalization to community nursing home settings. The only large-scale study of transinstitutionalization to nursing home care was conducted in Norway, in which the effects of downsizing psychiatric hospitals were evaluated for more than 50 years. During the first 2 decades, there was evidence for transinstitutionalization because patients previously treated in state-run psychiatric facilities were enrolled in increasing numbers in nursing homes. Similar to the Canadian evaluation, this pattern continued until community-based mental health services evolved to meet the needs of these psychiatric patients, with transinstitutionalization to nursing home care ending by the early 1970s. 8 Many nursing homes are unable to offer the specialized treatment required by patients discharged from state mental hospitals. 9 Concerns about such shortcomings led to the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 (OBRA-87). This legislation set guidelines for standardized mental health screening and treatment within nursing homes, with the goal of reducing inappropriate admissions and improving the care of patients with psychiatric conditions already enrolled in nursing home care. Although OBRA-87 had positive effects, 10,11 it also has its shortcomings. 12 Despite OBRA-87, available data suggest that nursing homes continue to have sizeable proportions of residents with serious psychiatric disorders. In a study of more than 9000 Veterans Health Administration (VHA) nursing home residents, nearly one fifth of residents (17.9%) met criteria for serious mental illness (SMI). 13 Similar levels of SMI prevalence were found in nursing home populations outside of the VHA. 14,15 It is unclear at this time whether these patients were placed appropriately into nursing home care or inappropriately admitted in the absence of adequate inpatient psychiatric services.
机译:目标。我们评估了减少住院精神病床位是否导致退伍军人卫生管理局(VHA)对重度精神疾病(SMI)患者的转院到护理院。方法。我们通过VHA国家患者护理数据库,VHA服务支持中心床位控制和VHA最低数据集评估了国家和站点级住院精神病床和疗养院患者人口统计,服务使用和功能的趋势。我们使用基于密歇根州医疗补助护理设施护理水平确定等级的倾向评分分析估计了疗养院入院的适当性。结果。从1999年到2007年,VHA住院精神病床数量减少(43?894–40?928),平均住院时间减少(33.1–19.0天),SMI在疗养院中的患病率上升(29.4%– 43.8%)。在站点级别,精神病患者住院床位的可用性与疗养院入院中SMI的患病率无关。但是,与没有SMI的居民相比,有SMI的养老院居民更容易被不适当地收治(4.0%比3.2%)。结论。这些结果表明,需要更多地关注SMI患者的长期护理需求。需要采取其他步骤,以确保为SMI患者提供适当的替代护理之所,并在入院治疗之前接受充分的筛查。在过去的半个世纪中,精神病治疗的重心已经从长期住院的精神病医院转移到了以社区为基础的门诊服务1,这种“非制度化”运动导致国家精神病医院床位急剧下降。 2该运动被视为“过去的灾难” 3,部分原因是门诊服务不足以满足有症状精神病患者的需求。 3,4在缺乏适当的社区服务的情况下,名义上的去机构化通常在实践中导致跨机构化,因为有症状的患者被转移到其他机构环境中,例如综合医院和疗养院。 1研究转制的研究结果好坏参半。从州立精神病医院出院的患者进行了3年的随访,发现社区精神病住院患者的住院率超过20%,每位患者平均每年住院天数超过75天。 5同样,对加拿大精神卫生系统的大规模纵向评估发现,住院精神病床数量的减少与综合医院精神病床利用率的提高有关,这种模式持续了超过20年,直到社区精神卫生服务范围扩大到满足精神病患者的需求。 6然而,另一项对出院状态的精神病患者的评估发现,出院后监狱和综合医院精神病部门的使用率相对于患者接受状态精神病治疗期间的服务使用率有所下降。 7对过渡到社区养老院环境的机构化的研究有限。在挪威进行的唯一一项关于转院到疗养院护理的大规模研究是对精神病院缩小规模的效果进行了50多年的评估。在最初的20年中,有证据表明可以进行转院,因为以前在国营精神病院接受治疗的患者越来越多地进入疗养院。与加拿大的评估类似,这种模式一直持续到以社区为基础的精神卫生服务不断发展以满足这些精神病患者的需求,并在1970年代初结束了向护理院的转制。 8许多疗养院无法为从州精神病院出院的患者提供所需的专业治疗。 9对此类缺陷的担忧导致了1987年的《综合预算和解法案》(OBRA-87)。这项立法为在疗养院内进行标准化的心理健康筛查和治疗制定了指南,目的是减少不适当的住院次数,并改善已经参加疗养院治疗的精神病患者的护理。尽管OBRA-87具有积极作用,但10,11也有其缺点。 12尽管有OBRA-87,但现有数据表明,疗养院中仍有严重精神疾病患者的比例很高。在对9000多名退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)疗养院居民的研究中,近五分之一的居民(17.9%)符合严重精神疾病(SMI)的标准。 13在VHA之外的疗养院人群中发现了类似的SMI患病率。 14,15目前尚不清楚这些患者是否被适当地安排到疗养院护理中,或者在缺乏足够的住院精神病服务的情况下是否被不适当地收治。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号