首页> 外文期刊>Allergy & Rhinology >Azelastine and Budesonide (Nasal Sprays): Effect of Combination Therapy Monitored by Acoustic Rhinometry and Clinical Symptom Score in the Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis
【24h】

Azelastine and Budesonide (Nasal Sprays): Effect of Combination Therapy Monitored by Acoustic Rhinometry and Clinical Symptom Score in the Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis

机译:氮卓斯汀和布地奈德(鼻腔喷雾剂):声鼻法和临床症状评分监测联合疗法在变应性鼻炎治疗中的作用

获取原文
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to objectively evaluate the effects of intranasal therapy with azelastine (AZE), budesonide (BUD), and combined AZE plus BUD (AZE/BUD) using a nasal provocation test (NPT) and acoustic rhinometry in patients with allergic rhinitis. A randomized, single-blind, crossover study with three treatment sequences was used. Thirty patients with persistent AR received the three treatments using a nasal spray twice daily for 30 days and were evaluated by an NPT with histamine before and after each period of treatment. The treatment comparison, assessed by the nasal responsiveness to histamine, was monitored based on subjective (symptom score) and objective parameters (acoustic rhinometry). The minimal cross-area 2 (MCA2) was measured by acoustic rhinometry at 1, 4, 8, and 12 minutes after NPT for each histamine concentration administered (0.5,1, 2, 4, and 6 mg/mL) up to at least a 20% reduction in the MCA2 from baseline (NPT20). The subjects were scored regarding nasal response encompassing histamine dose and time after histamine administration that caused nasal obstruction (NPT20 score) to assess the treatments' effects. Combination therapy produced a significant increase in baseline MCA2, viz., the improvement of nasal patency (p = 0.005). The symptoms score was significantly decreased after treatment with AZE (p = 0.03), BUD (p 20 score was significantly higher (p = 0.0009) after AZE/BUD, compared with AZE and BUD on their own. Thus, AZE therapy combined with BUD might provide more therapeutic benefits than the isolated drugs for improving nasal patency.
机译:这项研究的目的是客观地评估使用氮卓斯汀(AZE),布地奈德(BUD)以及联合使用AZE加BUD(AZE / BUD)的鼻腔激发试验(NPT)和声学鼻鼻炎对过敏性患者进行鼻内治疗的效果鼻炎。使用了具有三个治疗序列的随机,单盲,交叉研究。 30例持续性AR患者每天两次用鼻喷剂接受这三种治疗,共30天,并在每次治疗前后将NPT与组胺一起进行评估。根据主观(症状评分)和客观参数(声学鼻声法)监测通过鼻对组胺的反应评估的治疗比较。在NPT后的第1、4、8和12分钟,对于至少施用的每种组胺浓度(0.5、1、2、4和6 mg / mL),通过声学流变法测量最小横截面积2(MCA2)。与基线(NPT 20 )相比,MCA2降低了20%。对受试者的鼻腔反应进行评分,包括组胺剂量和组胺给药后引起鼻阻塞的时间(NPT 20 评分),以评估治疗效果。联合疗法使基线MCA2显着增加,即鼻腔通畅性改善(p = 0.005)。与单独使用AZE和BUD相比,AZE治疗后的症状评分显着降低(p = 0.03),BUD(p 20 评分显着高于(p = 0.0009)。与单独的药物联合使用,BUD疗法可以改善鼻腔通畅性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号