Management of conservation status of the minor architectural heritage.A comparison between the faster tools of analysis

摘要

An ever increasing portion of building interventions in Italy is increasingly concerned, beyondthe monumental singularities, the historical patrimony so-colled minor or ordinary, after a greater importanceof the historical-architectural value of these buildings, of the importance of their valorization, such to be moresensitive to the theme of their conservation.Recovering an historical building certainly means to get back inpossession of what has been lost, the reacquisition of a disappeared condition, and is a usually complex actionthat has to combine the respect of the existing one (materials, shapes, meanings, history) with the needs ofcurrent users, taking into account the available resources and capabilities, seeking a balance between thedifferent requests with the contribution of different disciplines. This operation is possible only through the use ofpre-analysis methodologies able to immediately assess the state of conservation and risk of loss of the buildingorganism being recovered.Thereby it is possible to identify an emergency staircase between the individualarchitectures which direct the subsequent detailed evaluations and avoid unnecessary deployment of resources,ensuring the maintenance of large-scale urban buildings. The present study aims to comparetwo tools able toensure the achievement of these intentions, comprising analogies and divergences of their conceptual modusoperandi.