首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Case Reports >Recurrent Acute Myocardial Infarction in a Patient with Severe Coronary Artery Ectasia: Implication of Antithrombotic Therapy
【24h】

Recurrent Acute Myocardial Infarction in a Patient with Severe Coronary Artery Ectasia: Implication of Antithrombotic Therapy

机译:重度冠状动脉蜕膜炎患者的复发性急性心肌梗死:抗栓治疗的意义

获取原文
           

摘要

Patient: Female, 78 Final Diagnosis: Acute myocardial infarction Symptoms: Chest discomfort Medication: — Clinical Procedure: — Specialty: Cardiology Objective: Unusual clinical course Background: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) can be caused not only by plaque rupture/erosion, but also by many other mechanisms. Thromboembolism due to atrial fibrillation and coronary thrombosis due to coronary artery ectasia are among the causes. Here we report on a case of recurrent myocardial infarction with coronary artery ectasia. Case Report: Our case was a 78-year-old woman with hypertension. Within a one-month interval, she developed AMI twice at the distal portion of her right coronary artery along with coronary artery ectasia. On both events, emergent coronary angiography showed no obvious organic stenosis or trace of plaque rupture at the culprit segment after thrombus aspiration. After the second acute event, we started anticoagulation therapy with warfarin to prevent thrombus formation. In the chronic phase, we confirmed, by using coronary angiography, optimal coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound, that there was no plaque rupture and no obvious thrombus formation along the coronary artery ectasia segment of the distal right coronary artery, which suggested effectiveness of anticoagulant. Furthermore, by Doppler velocimetry we found sluggish blood flow only in the coronary artery ectasia lesion but not in the left atrium which is generally the main site of systemic thromboembolism revealed by transesophageal echocardiography. Conclusions: These results suggest that the two AMI events at the same coronary artery ectasia segment were caused by local thrombus formation due to local stagnant blood flow. Although it has not yet been generally established, anticoagulation therapy may be effective to prevent thrombus formation in patients with coronary artery ectasia regardless of the prevalence of atrial fibrillation.
机译:患者:女,78岁最终诊断:急性心肌梗塞症状:胸部不适药物治疗:—临床程序:—专科:心脏病学目的:异常的临床过程背景:急性心肌梗死(AMI)不仅可以由斑块破裂/侵蚀引起,而且也可以通过许多其他机制。原因包括房颤引起的血栓栓塞和冠状动脉扩张引起的冠状动脉血栓形成。在这里,我们报告一例冠状动脉扩张症反复发作的心肌梗塞。病例报告:我们的病例是一名78岁的高血压妇女。在一个月的时间间隔内,她在右冠状动脉远端与冠状动脉扩张一起发生了两次AMI。在这两种情况下,急诊冠状动脉造影均未显示出明显的器质性狭窄或在血栓抽吸后在元凶段出现斑块破裂的痕迹。在第二次急性事件后,我们开始使用华法林进行抗凝治疗,以防止血栓形成。在慢性期,我们通过冠状动脉造影,最佳相干断层扫描和血管内超声证实,在右冠状动脉远端的冠状动脉扩张期段上没有斑块破裂且没有明显的血栓形成,提示抗凝治疗的有效性。此外,通过多普勒测速仪,我们发现仅在冠状动脉扩张期病变中血流缓慢,而在左心房则没有,这通常是经食管超声心动图检查发现的全身血栓栓塞的主要部位。结论:这些结果表明,在同一冠状动脉扩张期段的两次AMI事件是由于局部血流停滞导致局部血栓形成所致。尽管尚未普遍确立抗凝治疗方法,但无论房颤的发生率如何,抗凝治疗可能都能有效预防冠状动脉扩张症患者的血栓形成。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号