首页> 外文期刊>American journal of engineering and applied sciences >Developing a Computer Program for the Methods of Radius-Estimating Techniques for Horizontal Curves | Science Publications
【24h】

Developing a Computer Program for the Methods of Radius-Estimating Techniques for Horizontal Curves | Science Publications

机译:开发用于水平曲线半径估算技术方法的计算机程序|科学出版物

获取原文
       

摘要

> Problem statement: This study discusses the development of computer software of two phases. First phase contains the calculations of all curve elements of the four types of the horizontal curve and second phase contains the modeling of the ten methods of estimating the radius of the horizontal curve. Approach: The program is named as HCRET, which stands for Horizontal Curves and Radius Estimating Techniques. The program is written in Visual Basic-Version 6 language. The developed program deals with the calculation of all elements of the horizontal curve of the four types of the horizontal curves, which consists of simple, compound, reverse and transition. Results: The program also used for modeling of the ten methods of radius-estimating of horizontal curve, which consist of Ball Bank Indicator, Chord Length, Compass, Lateral Acceleration, Plan Sheet, Advisory Speed Plate, Modified Yaw Rate, Field Survey, and Global Positioning System for the calculation of estimated-radius. The program output is comprehensive and easy to understand, while the program input is used friendly and provided with many graphical objects to facilitate ease of use. A case study of three examples presented to evaluate the modeled software of three horizontal curves. Two curves were located in university of Baghdad and a third curve was designed and includes also the experimental work of radius-estimating methods of horizontal curves as follow field survey, plan sheet, compass, Global Positioning System (GPS). Conclusion/Recommendations: The results that obtained of the three curves by using the radius-estimating methods include the true and estimated radius of each method. The field survey and the plan sheet method provided the most accurate result 0.8002 and 0.8660 respectively. The plan sheet method and GPS method is preferred, because plan sheets are easily accessible to these users and GPS is the accurate field method. While the compass method is not the accurate, it is easy to use, and has a low cost.
机译: > 问题陈述:该研究讨论了计算机软件开发的两个阶段。第一阶段包含对四种类型的水平曲线的所有曲线元素的计算,第二阶段包含对估计水平曲线半径的十种方法的建模。 方法:该程序名为HCRET,代表“水平曲线”和“半径估算技术”。该程序是用Visual Basic版本6语言编写的。所开发的程序处理四种类型的水平曲线的水平曲线的所有元素的计算,包括简单,复合,反向和过渡。 结果:该程序还用于对水平曲线的半径估计的十种方法进行建模,其中包括:排球指示器,弦长,指南针,横向加速度,计划表,咨询速度盘,改进型偏航率,野外测量和全球定位系统,用于计算估计半径。程序输出内容全面且易于理解,而程序输入则友好使用,并提供了许多图形对象,以简化使用过程。给出了三个示例的案例研究,以评估三个水平曲线的建模软件。两条曲线位于巴格达大学,第三条曲线经设计,还包括水平曲线半径估计方法的实验工作,这些方法包括现场调查,计划表,指南针,全球定位系统(GPS)。 结论/建议:使用半径估计方法获得的三个曲线的结果包括每种方法的真实半径和估计半径。现场调查和计划表方法分别提供了最准确的结果0.8002和0.8660。计划表方法和GPS方法是首选,因为这些用户可以轻松访问计划表,而GPS是精确的现场方法。尽管指南针方法不准确,但它易于使用且成本较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号