首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Computational Mathematics >Extension of Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH), Mathematical Background of Vortex Blob Method (VBM) and Moving Particle Semi-Implicit (MPS)
【24h】

Extension of Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH), Mathematical Background of Vortex Blob Method (VBM) and Moving Particle Semi-Implicit (MPS)

机译:扩展了平滑粒子流体动力学(SPH),涡流斑点法(VBM)的数学背景和移动粒子半隐式(MPS)

获取原文
       

摘要

SPH has a reasonable mathematical background. Although VBM and MPS are similar to SPH, their ma-thematical backgrounds seem fragile. VBM has some problems in treating the viscous diffusion of vortices but is known as a practical method for calculating viscous flows. The mathematical background of MPS is also not sufficient. Not with standing, the numerical results seem reasonable in many cases. The problem common in both VBM and MPS is that the space derivatives necessary for calculating viscous diffusion are not estimated reasonably, although the treatment of advection is mathematically correct. This paper discusses a method to estimate the above mentioned problem of how to treat the space derivatives. The numerical results show the comparison among FDM (Finite Difference Method), SPH and MPS in detail. In some cases, there are big differences among them. An extension of SPH is also given.
机译:SPH具有合理的数学背景。尽管VBM和MPS与SPH相似,但它们的数学背景似乎很脆弱。 VBM在处理涡流的粘性扩散方面存在一些问题,但它是计算粘性流的实用方法。 MPS的数学背景也不充分。并非凭空站立,在许多情况下,数值结果似乎是合理的。尽管对流的处理在数学上是正确的,但在VBM和MPS中普遍存在的问题是,没有合理地估算出计算粘性扩散所需的空间导数。本文讨论了一种估计上述如何处理空间导数问题的方法。数值结果详细显示了FDM(有限差分法),SPH和MPS之间的比较。在某些情况下,它们之间存在很大差异。还给出了SPH的扩展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号