首页> 外文期刊>Acta anaesthesiologica Taiwanica : >Comparing the effectiveness of ropivacaine 0.5% versus ropivacaine 0.2% for transabdominis plane block in providing postoperative analgesia after appendectomy
【24h】

Comparing the effectiveness of ropivacaine 0.5% versus ropivacaine 0.2% for transabdominis plane block in providing postoperative analgesia after appendectomy

机译:比较罗哌卡因0.5%和罗哌卡因0.2%对经腹平面阻滞在阑尾切除术后提供术后镇痛的有效性

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: The basis for the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block involves infiltration of a local anesthetic into the neurofascial plane between the internal oblique and the transversus abdominis muscles, causing a regional block that spreads between the L1 and T10 dermatomes. Thus, the TAP block is said to be suitable for lower abdominal surgery. This study was designed to compare the analgesic efficacy of two different concentrations of ropivacaine for TAP block in patients undergoing appendectomy. Methods: Fifty-six patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II, aged 18 years and above, undergoing appendectomy were recruited in this prospective, randomized, double-blind study. They were divided into two groups: Group A patients who received 0.5 mL/kg of ropivacaine 0.5% and Group B patients who received 0.5 mL/kg of ropivacaine 0.2% via TAP block under ultrasound guidance. Postoperative pain was assessed using the visual analog scale upon arrival at the recovery room in the operating theatre, just prior to being discharged to the ward, and at 6 hours, 12 hours, 18 hours, and 24 hours postoperatively to compare the effectiveness of analgesia. Results: Intraoperatively, patients in Group B required a significantly greater amount of additional intravenous fentanyl than those in Group A. There were no significant statistical differences in pain scores at rest and on movement at all assessment times as well as in the dose of 24-hour intravenous morphine consumption given via patient-controlled analgesia postoperatively between the two groups. Conclusion: The effectiveness of two different concentrations of ropivacaine (0.5% versus 0.2%) given via TAP block was comparable in providing postoperative analgesia for patients undergoing appendectomy.
机译:目的:腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞的基础涉及局部麻醉药渗入内斜肌和腹横肌之间的神经筋膜平面,从而导致区域性阻滞扩散至L1和T10皮层之间。因此,据说TAP阻滞适合于下腹部手术。本研究旨在比较两种不同浓度的罗哌卡因对阑尾切除术患者TAP阻滞的镇痛效果。方法:这项前瞻性,随机,双盲研究招募了56名年龄在18岁及以上,接受阑尾切除术的美国麻醉医师协会I或II身体状况的患者。他们分为两组:A组患者接受0.5 mL / kg罗哌卡因0.5%,B组患者接受TAP阻断在超声引导下接受0.5 mL / kg罗哌卡因0.5%。在到达手术室的恢复室时,即将出院前,以及术后6小时,12小时,18小时和24小时使用视觉模拟量表评估术后疼痛,以比较镇痛的效果。结果:术中,B组患者比A组患者需要更多的静脉内芬太尼。在所有评估时间,静息,运动时的疼痛评分以及24剂量的剂量均无统计学差异。两组之间在术后1小时通过患者自控镇痛镇静地服用吗啡。结论:通过TAP阻滞给予两种不同浓度的罗哌卡因(0.5%对0.2%)的有效性在为阑尾切除术患者提供术后镇痛方面具有可比性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号