...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta anaesthesiologica Taiwanica : >Comparison of 4% articaine and 0.5% bupivacaine anesthetic efficacy in orthodontic extractions: Prospective, randomized crossover study
【24h】

Comparison of 4% articaine and 0.5% bupivacaine anesthetic efficacy in orthodontic extractions: Prospective, randomized crossover study

机译:正畸拔牙中4%青蒿素和0.5%布比卡因麻醉效果的比较:前瞻性,随机交叉研究

获取原文

摘要

Aim: Articaine and bupivacaine are both amide-type local anesthetic (LA) agents, of almost equal potency. However, lidocaine is considered the gold standard and is the most widely used anesthetic agent because of its potency, safety, and efficiency. Articaine is fast acting and bupivacaine is a long-lasting LA. The aim of this randomized controlled crossover clinical study was to evaluate and compare the clinical anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 0.5% bupivacaine in orthodontic extractions models. Methods: Forty systemically healthy patients (age range: 10-18 years), requiring premolar extraction for orthodontic reasons (all 4 premolars) were included. Patients were categorized into two groups (4% articaine and 0.5% bupivacaine) in a crossover manner (160 premolars). Parameters recorded included: time of anesthetic onset, duration of postoperative analgesia, time to first rescue analgesic medication, and visual analog scale (VAS). At the first appointment, both upper and lower premolars were extracted on one side of the jaws (right or left). A fixed volume of 1.4 mL of 4% articaine or 0.5% bupivacaine (based on a computer-generated list) was infiltrated in the buccal vestibule (local infiltration) for extraction. At the second appointment, after a washout period of 15 days, the anesthetic agent that was not administered at the first appointment was administered in a crossover manner. Each patient was evaluated using a 100-mm VAS during and after extraction. Results: The results showed that 4% articaine had significantly faster onset of action and lower VAS scores when compared with bupivacaine. However, the duration of analgesia and time to first rescue analgesic medication was longer in the bupivacaine group. Conclusion: Articaine seemed to have better potency and efficacy in terms of onset of action and lower pain scores compared to the bupivacaine group. Further studies are required to confirm these results.
机译:目的:阿替卡因和布比卡因都是酰胺类局部麻醉药,其药效几乎相等。但是,利多卡因被认为是金标准,由于其效力,安全性和效率而被广泛使用。青蒿素作用迅速,布比卡因是持久的LA。这项随机对照交叉临床研究的目的是评估和比较4%青蒿素和0.5%布比卡因在正畸拔牙模型中的临床麻醉效果。方法:40名系统健康的患者(年龄范围:10-18岁),由于正畸原因需要进行前磨牙拔除(全部4个前磨牙)。以交叉方式(160摩尔)将患者分为两组(4%青蒿素和0.5%布比卡因)。记录的参数包括:麻醉开始的时间,术后镇痛的持续时间,首次抢救镇痛药物的时间和视觉模拟量表(VAS)。第一次约会时,上下颌的前磨牙均在颌的一侧(右或左)拔出。将固定体积的1.4 mL 4%青蒿素或0.5%布比卡因(基于计算机生成的清单)浸入颊前庭中(局部浸润)以进行提取。在第二次预约中,在15天的清除期后,以交叉方式给予第一次预约时未使用的麻醉剂。在拔除过程中和拔除后,均使用100毫米VAS对每个患者进行评估。结果:结果表明,与布比卡因相比,4%的青蒿素具有明显更快的起效和较低的VAS评分。但是,布比卡因组的镇痛时间和首次抢救镇痛药物的时间较长。结论:与布比卡因组相比,在开始发作和降低疼痛评分方面,青蒿素似乎具有更好的效力和功效。需要进一步研究以确认这些结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号