首页> 外文期刊>Africa Spectrum >And They Are Still Targeting: Assessing the Effectiveness of Targeted Sanctions against Zimbabwe
【24h】

And They Are Still Targeting: Assessing the Effectiveness of Targeted Sanctions against Zimbabwe

机译:而且它们仍是针对性的:评估针对津巴布韦的有针对性的制裁的有效性

获取原文
           

摘要

Targeted sanctions have been extensively used by states throughout history to achieve political objectives. This article examines the European Union’s and United States’ targeted sanctions against the Zimbabwean regime, which have been in place for several years. The central thesis of the article is that the sanctions are not effective and thus have failed to achieve the political objectives of both the European Union and the United States. Numerous violations of the travel ban and the financial restrictions have undermined the general effectiveness of the sanctions. A detailed analysis of each individual measure empirically supports the argument that the ineffectiveness of the sanctions has negatively influenced the achievement of the political objectives. In addition, by taking a closer look at Risa Brooks’ theory and discussing it in regards to the Zimbabwean sanctions, attention is drawn to the question of how to target authoritarian regimes.
机译:在整个历史上,有针对性的制裁已被各州广泛用于实现政治目标。本文研究了已经实施了几年的欧盟和美国针对津巴布韦政权的有针对性的制裁。该文章的中心论点是,制裁是无效的,因此未能实现欧盟和美国的政治目标。许多违反旅行禁令和财务限制的行为破坏了制裁的总体效力。对每项措施的详细分析从经验上支持以下论点:制裁的无效性对政治目标的实现产生了负面影响。此外,通过仔细研究里萨·布鲁克斯的理论并就津巴布韦的制裁进行讨论,人们注意到了如何针对威权政体的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号