首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics >Comparison of Accuracy of Support Vector Machine Model and Logistic Regression Model in Predicting Individual Loan Defaults
【24h】

Comparison of Accuracy of Support Vector Machine Model and Logistic Regression Model in Predicting Individual Loan Defaults

机译:支持向量机模型与Logistic回归模型在预测个人贷款违约率中的准确性比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Prediction of loan defaults is critical to financial institutions in order to minimize losses from loan non-payments. Some of the models that have been used to predict loan default include logistic regression models, linear discriminant analysis models and extreme value theory models. These models are parametric in nature thus they assume that the response being investigated takes a particular functional form. However, there is a possibility that the functional form used to estimate the response is very different from the actual functional form of the response. In such a case, the resulting model will be inaccurate. Support vector machine is non-parametric and does not take any prior assumption of the functional form of the data. The purpose of this study was to compare prediction of individual loan defaults in Kenya using support vector machine and logistic regression models. The data was obtained from equity bank for the period between 2006 and 2016. A sample of 1000 loan applicants whose loans had been approved was used. The variables considered were credit history, purpose of the loan, loan amount, saving account status, employment status, gender, age, security and area of residence. The data was split into training and test data. The train data was used to train the logistic regression and support vector machine models. The study fitted logistic regression and support vector machine models. Logistic regression model showed an accuracy of 0.7727 with the train data and 0.7333 with test data. The logistic regression model showed precision of 0.8440 and 0.8244 with the train and test data. The SVM (linear kernel) model showed an accuracy of 0.8829 and 0.8612 with the train and test respectively. The SVM (linear kernel) showed a precision of 0.8785 with the train data and 0.7831 with the test data. The results showed that support vector machine model performed better than logistic regression model. The study recommended the use of support vector machines in loan default prediction in financial institutions.
机译:贷款违约的预测对于金融机构至关重要,以最大程度地减少因未偿还贷款而造成的损失。一些用于预测贷款违约的模型包括逻辑回归模型,线性判别分析模型和极值理论模型。这些模型本质上是参数化的,因此它们假定所研究的响应采用特定的功能形式。但是,用于估计响应的功能形式可能与响应的实际功能形式有很大不同。在这种情况下,生成的模型将不准确。支持向量机是非参数的,并且不对数据的功能形式进行任何先验假设。这项研究的目的是使用支持向量机和逻辑回归模型比较肯尼亚个人贷款违约的预测。该数据是从股权银行获得的2006年至2016年期间的数据。使用了1000个已批准贷款的贷款申请人的样本。所考虑的变量是信贷历史记录,贷款目的,贷款金额,储蓄账户状态,就业状态,性别,年龄,安全性和居住面积。数据分为训练和测试数据。训练数据用于训练逻辑回归和支持向量机模型。该研究适合逻辑回归和支持向量机模型。 Logistic回归模型显示的训练数据精度为0.7727,测试数据的精度为0.7333。逻辑回归模型通过训练和测试数据显示精度为0.8440和0.8244。 SVM(线性核)模型在训练和测试中分别显示出0.8829和0.8612的精度。 SVM(线性核)对列车数据的精度为0.8785,对测试数据的精度为0.7831。结果表明,支持向量机模型的性能优于逻辑回归模型。该研究建议在金融机构的贷款违约预测中使用支持向量机。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号