首页> 外文期刊>Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries >With or Without Community Participation: A Lesson from Joint Forest Management in the Eastern Arc Mountains, Tanzania
【24h】

With or Without Community Participation: A Lesson from Joint Forest Management in the Eastern Arc Mountains, Tanzania

机译:有或没有社区参与:坦桑尼亚东部弧山联合森林管理的教训

获取原文
           

摘要

Participation is now a dominant conservation narrative in Tanzania as the government is advocating partnership with local communities through Joint Forest Management (JFM). However, conservationists claim that participation does not lead to sustainable conservation and that there is a gap between rhetoric and practice. We assessed stocking and disturbance levels in forests with JFM and compared them with those without. The comparison was done for selected forests within Eastern Arc Mountains in Tanzania with similar ecological characteristics. Systematic forest inventory was employed and 152 circular plots were sampled. Stocking was higher in forests with JFM than forests without for both montane and lowland forests. The difference was statistically significant across all the vegetation types except in woodland (p= 0.9049). However, forest reserves under JFM were more disturbed than those without. Even though, the disturbances were sustainable and ecologically good as they were below the mean annual increment and therefore considered beneficial to the forest in terms of stimulating regeneration of the harvested tree species. The most harvested tree species in montane forest was Ocotea usambarensis while in the lowland forests were Cedrela odorata, Milicia excelsa, Combretum molle and Albizia petersiana. Lack of incentives, benefit sharing mechanisms and market demands led to weak enforcement of set regulations. As a result, JFM have failed to stop illegal harvesting and these forests have become focal points for disturbances. Therefore, there is a need for taking corrective measures before scaling up of JFM in other parts of the country.
机译:由于坦桑尼亚政府正在倡导通过联合森林管理(JFM)与当地社区建立伙伴关系,因此现在参与已成为坦桑尼亚的主要保护话题。但是,环保主义者声称,参与并不会导致可持续的环境保护,而且言辞和实践之间存在差距。我们评估了使用JFM的森林中的种群和干扰水平,并将其与未使用JFM的森林进行比较。比较了坦桑尼亚东部弧山内具有类似生态特征的部分森林。使用系统的森林清单,并抽样了152个圆形样地。具有JFM的森林中的林木蓄积量高于没有山地和低地森林的林木蓄积量。除林地外,所有植被类型之间的差异均具有统计学意义(p = 0.9049)。但是,JFM下的森林保护区比没有森林保护区的森林保护区更受干扰。即使这些干扰是可持续的,并且在生态上也不错,因为它们低于年均增长量,因此就刺激采伐树种的再生而言,被认为对森林有益。山地森林中最常采伐的树种是美国的Ocotea usambarensis,而低地森林中的采伐树种则是香茅(Cedrela odorata),米利西亚(Milicia excelsa),Combretum molle和阿尔卑斯山(Albizia petersiana)。缺乏激励机制,利益共享机制和市场需求导致制定规章的执行不力。结果,JFM无法制止非法采伐,而这些森林已成为骚扰的焦点。因此,在该国其他地区扩大JFM之前,需要采取纠正措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号